Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 368, Issue 9549, 18–24 November 2006, Pages 1745-1747
The Lancet

Comment
The ever growing story of cyclo-oxygenase inhibition

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69667-0Get rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (13)

  • IA Reilly et al.

    Inhibition of thromboxane formation in vivo and ex vivo: implications for therapy with platelet inhibitory drugs

    Blood

    (1987)
  • ML Capone et al.

    Pharmacodynamic interaction of naproxen with low-dose aspirin in healthy subjects

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2005)
  • CP Cannon et al.

    Cardiovascular outcomes with etoricoxib and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: results from the Multinational Etoricoxib and Diclofenac Arthritis Long-term (MEDAL) programme

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • T Grosser et al.

    Biological basis for the cardiovascular consequences of COX-2 inhibition: therapeutic challenges and opportunities

    J Clin Invest

    (2006)
  • LA García Rodríguez et al.

    Differential effects of aspirin and nonaspirin nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in the primary prevention of myocardial infarction in postmenopausal women

    Epidemiology

    (2000)
  • PM Kearney et al.

    Do selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk of atherothrombosis? Meta-analysis of randomised trials

    BMJ

    (2006)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (28)

  • Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modeling of novel selective COX-2 inhibitors: sulfide, sulfoxide, and sulfone derivatives of 1,5-diarylpyrrol-3-substituted scaffold

    2019, Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, according to the evidences of different observational studies and randomized clinical trials the cardiovascular hazard is not restricted to selective COX-2 inhibitors but also to some tNSAIDs, such as diclofenac.16 The most plausible mechanism is the suppression of COX-2-dependent prostacyclin, leaving unconstrained the intricate network of stimuli predisposing to atherogenesis, hypertension, and thrombosis, such as Thromboxane (TxA2).17 The finding of a marked variability in how each person reacts to these drugs,18 encouraged the development of novel compounds in order to increase the spectrum of therapeutic opportunities for each individual patient.

  • Antiproliferative effect of two novel COX-2 inhibitors on human keratinocytes

    2013, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    Unfortunately, many studies have identified an increased risk for cardiovascular events (Bresalier et al., 2005; Solomon et al., 2005) associated with chronic use of COXib. The most plausible explanation for this effect is the suppression of COX-2-dependent prostacyclin (Grosser et al., 2006), leaving unconstrained the intricate network of stimuli predisposing to thrombosis, atherogenesis, and hypertension, such as TXA2 (Rodriguez and Patrignani, 2006; Anzini et al., 2008). However, the withdrawal from the market of some COXib due to the increase of the risk of heart attack and cardiovascular side effects (Mason et al., 2006; Scheen, 2004) and the finding of a marked variability in how each person reacts to these drugs, mainly based on their genetic background, (Fries et al., 2006) encouraged many researchers to disclose new selective COX-2 inhibitors endowed with good anti-inflammatory activity along with no toxic side effects.

  • Perioperative use of cox-2 agents

    2009, Current Therapy in Pain
  • Perioperative use of cox-2 agents

    2008, Current Therapy in Pain: Expert Consult
  • Role of Dose Potency in the Prediction of Risk of Myocardial Infarction Associated With Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in the General Population

    2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Over and above the effect of dose, data for slow-release formulations of diclofenac suggested a greater risk of MI, probably as a direct consequence of prolonged drug exposure. This level of risk was greater than it was for any of the ones shared by coxibs and reinforces the approach of analyzing the CV risk of each member of the large NSAID family individually (20). The incidence of MI was much greater among patients with antecedents of CAD than it was among patients without a history of CAD.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text