Elsevier

Human Immunology

Volume 69, Issue 11, November 2008, Pages 708-714
Human Immunology

Murine CD8+ regulatory T lymphocytes: The new era

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2008.08.288Get rights and content

Abstract

Regulatory T lymphocytes unequivocally play a major role in the maintenance of immunologic homeostasis. The first descriptions of regulatory T lymphocytes concerned CD8+ cells, but this field was brought into discredit when some of its central tenets turned out to be erroneous. CD4+ regulatory T cells took over and, with the help of newly developed molecular tools, rapidly were phenotypically and functionally characterized. We now know that these cells control a large variety of immune responses. However some observations of in vitro or in vivo immune regulation could not be explained with CD4+ regulatory T cell activity and depended on the action of a variety of CD8+ T cell populations. In recent years, substantial progress has been made in the phenotypic and functional characterization of CD8+ regulatory T cells. These cells play a role in the control of intestinal immunity, immunopathology, and autoimmunity, as well as in immune privilege of the eye, in oral tolerance, and in prevention of graft-versus-host disease and graft-rejection. The suppressor effector mechanisms used by these cells are in part shared with CD4+ regulatory T cells and in part unique to this population. We here review the current literature on naturally occurring and experimentally induced murine CD8+ regulatory T-cell populations.

Introduction

Regulation of immune responses by T lymphocytes has been a central tenet in immunology ever since the 1960s. The first era of so-called suppressor T cells rose with the original reports by Gershon and Kondo and by McCullagh in the early 1970s [1], [2], [3], and its demise seriously started only hardly more than a decade later most notably with the molecular characterization of the I–J locus. Genetic analyses suggested that I–J encoded a suppressor factor, but its molecular analysis showed that it did not encode any identifiable gene or transcript [4], [5]. This era in the history of immunology must have been intellectually very stimulating and still elicits strong viewpoints from historical authors [6], [7], [8], [9]. However, the demise of the field was in part caused by lack of tools and, as a consequence, inability to “distinguish poorly executed science from good science,” and “a significant level of indiscipline and poor training” [9]. Despite the observation that the historical suppressor T cells expressed CD8 (Ly2, Ly3) [10], [11], we therefore feel that we should focus this review on CD8+ ‘regulatory’ (rather than ‘suppressor’) T cells on data from the postsuppressor era.

During development of T lymphocytes in primary lymphoid organs, the genes encoding their antigen receptors undergo random somatic rearrangements. The resulting, still immature repertoire is therefore very large and contains many cells specific for self-antigens. Probably the majority of these potentially self-reactive cells are negatively selected by induction of anergy or apoptosis [12], [13]. However a significant number of potentially self-reactive lymphocytes leave the primary lymphoid organs [14] and are kept under control by peripheral tolerance mechanisms [15]. Probably the most important of these mechanisms is active regulation assured by regulatory T lymphocytes (Treg) capable of suppressing adaptive and innate immune responses [16], [17], [18].

The best-characterized Treg population is of CD4+Foxp3+ phenotype. However Treg populations that express CD8 or are CD4/CD8 “double negative” have also been described. The latter populations lack (unduly so and probably for historical reasons) the wide attention of immunologists. Scientists working on these populations face the difficult challenge to convince their colleagues of the relevance and importance of the field.

We will limit this review to murine CD8+ Treg, with reference to human counterparts when applicable. Similarly to CD4+ Treg, a distinction will be made between “natural” and “induced” CD8+ Treg populations. “Natural” Treg are cells that develop in the thymus, constitute stable lineages. “Induced” Treg are generated under experimental conditions and may or may not have stable phenotypes [19]. Several naturally occurring as well as induced immunoregulatory CD8+ T cell populations apparently using distinct effector suppressor mechanisms have been described (Table 1, Table 2). We will pay particular attention to a CD8+ Treg population characterized by the absence of CD28 expression and to its potential role in inflammatory bowel diseases.

Section snippets

Natural and induced CD8+ CD25+ Foxp3+ Treg in mice

In the CD4+ T cell population, the best characterized Treg population expresses CD25 and Foxp3. Similarly, among CD8+ T cells a small population of Foxp3-expressing CD25+ cells with in vitro regulatory capacity is found in the thymus and peripheral lymphoid organs of mice [20]. The phenotype of these CD8αβ cells is strikingly similar to their CD4+ counterpart. Most notably, they have an activated CD44high phenotype, express cell-surface molecules involved in suppressor effector functions of CD4+

CD8+ (CD75s+?) Treg induced by oral administration of antigen

Oral administration of self or nonself antigen leads to tolerance in a large variety of experimental models. Whereas other T-cell populations inhibiting or deviating immune responses are also involved, CD8+ Treg develop on oral antigen feeding [47]. Thus oral administration of myelin basic protein (MBP) led to reduced development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) [48]. Transfer of total but not of CD3- or CD8-depleted splenocytes from MBP-fed rats rendered adoptive hosts

CD8+ Treg development upon neonatal tolerance induction in rats

Th2-mediated autoimmune disease develops in susceptible rats upon subcutaneous injection of mercury salts. Neonatal subcutaneous administration of this heavy metal led to resistance to subsequent disease induction. The suppression was dominant and could be transferred with CD8+ (but not CD4+) splenocytes [58]. As compared with splenocytes from diseased rats, CD8+ splenocytes from tolerant animals were enriched in cells producing CD45RChigh, CD25+, IFN-γ, and IL-2. The immunosuppressive

Natural and induced CD8+ CD45RClow Treg in rats

In rats, CD8+ T cells with in vitro and in vivo suppressor activity were found in the CD45RClow population [59]. These cells were very similar, but not identical, to CD4+ Treg. As compared with “conventional” CD8+CD45RChigh cells, CD45RClow Treg transcribed Foxp3 and CTLA4, but not GITR genes at higher levels. In vitro, these cells inhibited proliferation and IFN-γ production in a cell-contact dependent manner; but, in contrast to CD4+ Treg, exogenous IL-2 did not reverse this suppressive

Natural CD8+ CD122high Treg in mice

Another natural CD8+ Treg population was discovered upon the description that CD122 (IL-2Rβ-chain)–deficient mice developed T-cell–mediated severe anemia [61]. Although other mechanisms may also apply, it was shown that the immunopathologic condition was at least in part caused by the absence of a regulatory CD8+CD122+ population [62]. We have observed that all mouse CD8+ T cells express CD122, but that a small subpopulation express very high levels [63]. Based on these results we will further

Intestinal CD8ααTCRαβ natural Treg in mice

In contrast to thymus-derived CD8+ cells, which express the CD8αβ hererodimer, the majority of CD8+ cells in the intestinal epithelium express a CD8αα homodimer. Although some TCRαβ CD8αα T cells with characteristics of innate immune cells can develop in the thymus upon interaction with high levels of agonist ligands [66], most TCRαβ CD8αα cells develop in the intestine. These cells have an oligoclonal but not canonical TCR repertoire enriched in autospecific cells [67]. TCRαβCD8αα

“Naturally induced” Qa-1–restricted CD8αα+ Treg in mice

Immune responses, even those directed to pathogens, need to be tightly controlled to avoid pathologic conditions and death (e.g., by septic shock). Thus the injection of superantigens, which activate large numbers of T lymphocytes, is followed by strong proliferation and then by disappearance of reactive cells. It was shown that CD8+ T cells restricted by the nonclassic MHC class Ib molecule Qa-1, an HLA-E homolog, played a role in control of the TCR Vβ3+ CD4+ T-cell response to the bacterial

CD8+ CD11c+ Treg in mice

Signaling through the co-stimulatory molecule CD137 (4-1BB) enhances CD8+ and reduces CD4+ T-cell responses. Administration of an agonist antibody to CD137 inhibits development of collagen-induced arthritis, a murine model for rheumatoid arthritis [80]. Suppression of arthritis could be transferred to adoptive hosts with CD8+CD11c+ T cells from protected animals. IFN-γ produced by Treg as well as IDO were shown to play crucial roles in this process. IFN-γ potentially induced IDO on macrophages

Natural CD8+ CD28 Treg in mice

CD28-deficient mice are resistant to active induction of EAE. Although this result would suggest a requirement of CD28 for induction of disease, depletion of CD8+ cells in CD28-deficient mice renders them susceptible [83]. In contrast, CD8-deficient mice develop more severe EAE than wild-type animals, and injection of CD8+CD28 (but not CD8+CD28+) T cells before disease induction lowers disease severity to wild-type levels. In vitro, CD8+CD28 cells inhibited IFN-γ production in mixed

Conclusion

The numerous reports discussed here clearly indicate a renaissance of the field of CD8+ Treg. Even if the term “regulatory” is imprecise and suggests that such cells may also have an activating function on immune responses, it rightfully suggests similarity with CD4+ Treg. Moreover, its use may help to overcome the bad feelings associated with the expression “suppressor” T cells. Several CD8+ Treg populations have been identified, some of which are phenotypically and functionally well

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Association François Aupetit (2007).

References (88)

  • M. Allez et al.

    Expansion of CD8+ T cells with regulatory function after interaction with intestinal epithelial cells

    Gastroenterology

    (2002)
  • O. Joffre et al.

    Induction of antigen-specific tolerance to bone marrow allografts with CD4+CD25+ T lymphocytes

    Blood

    (2004)
  • O. Joffre et al.

    CD4+CD25+ regulatory T lymphocytes in bone marrow transplantation

    Semin Immunol

    (2006)
  • R.K. Gershon et al.

    Cell interactions in the induction of tolerance: The role of thymic lymphocytes

    Immunol

    (1970)
  • R.K. Gershon et al.

    Infectious immunological tolerance

    Immunology

    (1971)
  • P.J. McCullagh

    The transfer of immunological competence to rats tolerant of sheep erythrocytes with lymphocytes from normal rats

    Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci

    (1970)
  • M. Steinmetz et al.

    A molecular map of the immune response region from the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse

    Nature

    (1982)
  • M. Kronenberg et al.

    RNA transcripts for I-J polypeptides are apparently not encoded between the I-A and I-E subregions of the murine major histocompatibility complex

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (1983)
  • A. Basten et al.

    Special regulatory T-cell review: T-cell dependent suppression revisited

    Immunology

    (2008)
  • R.N. Germain

    Special regulatory T-cell review: A rose by any other name: From suppressor T cells to Tregs, approbation to unbridled enthusiasm

    Immunology

    (2008)
  • J.A. Kapp

    Special regulatory T-cell review: Suppressors regulated but unsuppressed

    Immunology

    (2008)
  • H. Waldmann

    Special regulatory T cell review: The suppression problem

    Immunology

    (2008)
  • H. Cantor et al.

    Separation of helper T cells from suppressor T cells expressing different Ly componentsII. Activation by antigen: After immunization, antigen-specific suppressor and helper activities are mediated by distinct T-cell subclasses

    J Exp Med

    (1976)
  • J. Jandinski et al.

    Separation of helper T cells from suppressor T cells expressing different Ly componentsI. Polyclonal activation: suppressor and helper activities are inherent properties of distinct T-cell subclasses

    J Exp Med

    (1976)
  • J.P.M. van Meerwijk et al.

    Quantitative impact of thymic clonal deletion on the T cell repertoire

    J Exp Med

    (1997)
  • K.A. Hogquist et al.

    Central tolerance: Learning self-control in the thymus

    Nat Rev Immunol

    (2005)
  • B. Stockinger

    T lymphocyte tolerance: From thymic deletion to peripheral control mechanisms

    Adv Immunol

    (1999)
  • E.M. Shevach et al.

    The lifestyle of naturally occurring CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells

    Immunol Rev

    (2006)
  • S. Sakaguchi et al.

    Foxp3+ CD25+ CD4+ natural regulatory T cells in dominant self-tolerance and autoimmune disease

    Immunol Rev

    (2006)
  • Q. Tang et al.

    The Foxp3+ regulatory T cell: A jack of all trades, master of regulation

    Nat Immunol

    (2008)
  • S. Floess et al.

    Epigenetic control of the Foxp3 locus in regulatory T cells

    PLoS Biol

    (2007)
  • B. Bienvenu et al.

    Peripheral CD8+CD25+ T lymphocytes from MHC class II-deficient mice exhibit regulatory activity

    J Immunol

    (2005)
  • H. von Boehmer

    Mechanisms of suppression by suppressor T cells

    Nat Immunol

    (2005)
  • S. Sugita et al.

    CTLA-4+CD8+ T cells that encounter B7-2+ iris pigment epithelial cells express their own B7-2 to achieve global suppression of T cell activation

    J Immunol

    (2004)
  • S. Sugita et al.

    B7+ iris pigment epithelium induce CD8+ T regulatory cells; both suppress CTLA-4+ T cells

    J Immunol

    (2006)
  • S. Sugita et al.

    Iris pigment epithelium expressing CD86 (B7-2) directly suppresses T cell activation in vitro via binding to cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4

    J Exp Med

    (2003)
  • J.A. Kapp et al.

    TCR transgenic CD8+ T cells activated in the presence of TGFbeta express FoxP3 and mediate linked suppression of primary immune responses and cardiac allograft rejection

    Int Immunol

    (2006)
  • W. Chen et al.

    Conversion of peripheral CD4+CD25− naive T cells to CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells by TGF-{beta} induction of transcription factor Foxp3

    J Exp Med

    (2003)
  • M.J. Benson et al.

    All-trans retinoic acid mediates enhanced T reg cell growth differentiation, and gut homing in the face of high levels of co-stimulation

    J Exp Med

    (2007)
  • O. Joffre et al.

    Prevention of acute and chronic allograft rejection with CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T lymphocytes

    Nat Med

    (2008)
  • C.C. Chang et al.

    Tolerization of dendritic cells by T(S) cells: The crucial role of inhibitory receptors ILT3 and ILT4

    Nat Immunol

    (2002)
  • A. Nakamura et al.

    Exacerbated graft-versus-host disease in Pirb−/− mice

    Nat Immunol

    (2004)
  • J. Stein-Streilein et al.

    Anterior chamber associated immune deviation (ACAID): Regulation, biological relevance, and implications for therapy

    Int Rev Immunol

    (2002)
  • J.W. Streilein et al.

    Characterization of the suppressor cell(s) responsible for anterior chamber-associated immune deviation (ACAID) induced in BALB/c mice by P815 cells

    J Immunol

    (1985)
  • Cited by (48)

    • CD8<sup>+</sup> T activation attenuates CD4<sup>+</sup> T proliferation through dendritic cells modification

      2015, Cellular Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Multiple regulatory CD8+ T subsets, including Qa-1 restricted regulatory CD8+ T [9], CD8+CD122+ T [31], CD8+CD103+ T [32], CD8+CD28− T [33], CD8+CD25+FoxP3+ T [34] and IL-10-secreting CD8+ T [35], had garnered much attention for their roles in maintenance of immune homeostasis. Different mechanisms also had been explored to explain the regulatory functions of these regulatory CD8+ T subsets, such as cell–cell contact, immunosuppressive factor induction or secretion, and even cytotoxicity dependence [1,8]. Here, different from those previous special regulatory CD8+ T subsets, we investigated the direct feedback regulation of activated CD8+ T population.

    • CD8<sup>+</sup>CD25<sup>+</sup> T cells reduce atherosclerosis in apoE(-/-) mice

      2014, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, it remains unclear whether the observed phenotypes contribute to disease progression or if it operates to down-modulate pro-atherogenic immune signaling. For example, CD8+CD25+ T cells functioning as suppressors are involved in the modulation of autoimmune disorders with similar function to CD4+ Tregs [7,10–15]. The role of this phenotype in atherogenesis is highlighted by our previous report showing increased CD8+CD25+ T cells early after immunization of apoE(−/−) mice with an apoB-100 derived peptide vaccine [16].

    • Effects of dexamethasone and meloxicam on bovine CD25<sup>+</sup>CD8<sup>+</sup> and CD25<sup>-</sup>CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells - in vitro study

      2013, Research in Veterinary Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      It was shown in that study that the administration of dexamethasone to animals resulted in an increase in the percentage of CD25+ PBMCs, which was also interpreted as an increase in the number of activated cells. The CD25 molecule is basically a T-cell activation marker, but natural and induced human (reviewed in Suzuki et al., 2008) and murine (reviewed in Pomié et al., 2008) CD25+CD8+ regulatory lymphocytes are also known, expressing Foxp3 as opposed to activated cells. Foxp3 confers suppressive properties and is confined to regulatory T-cells (Fontenot et al., 2003; Hori et al., 2003; Khattri et al., 2003).

    • TGF-β Regulation of T Cells

      2023, Annual Review of Immunology
    • CD8<sup>+</sup>T regulatory cells in lupus

      2021, Rheumatology and Immunology Research
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    I. Ménager-Marcq is currently at INRA, UMR 1225, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

    View full text