Commentary
Averting the proliferation of acronymophilia in dermatology: Effectively avoiding ADCOMSUBORDCOMPHIBSPAC

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.10.035Get rights and content

Section snippets

Methods

PubMed, Medline, and Ovid searches were performed using the following terms: acronym, memorization, efficient use, appropriate use, learning, memory, medicine, medical, length, and clinical. Studies were evaluated for scientific contribution and strength of the research preformed. Reports with acronyms in the title but that did not address the actual topic of acronyms were not reviewed. This review attempted to focus on studies in normal subjects with no known learning impairments or neurologic

Results

The search term “acronym” yielded 1041 articles using PubMed alone. In general, reports in which new acronyms are presented rarely provide an explanation as to why the acronym was chosen other then basing this decision on clinical descriptors. No reports were found in which the acronym was specifically chosen based on both clinical descriptor and with the use of evidence-based research on the ideal way to design an acronym. Furthermore, such acronyms are not always based on the first letter of

Discussion

The lure of using acronyms to learn and retain information is clear. Among many other benefits, it facilitates memorization and therefore allows for more efficient disease identification. In lay populations, acronyms are also frequently used to readily convey information. For example, the RACE acronym is used to teach the public about fire safety: remove all persons to safety, activate manual pull station, close doors, and extinguish the fire. However, on further evaluation of the lay world use

References (47)

  • M.M. Cohen

    Syndrome designations

    J Med Genet

    (1976)
  • M. Berkwits

    Capture! Shock! Excite! Clinical trial acronyms and the “branding” of clinical research

    Ann Intern Med

    (2000)
  • H.L. Fred et al.

    Acronymesis: the exploding misuse of acronyms

    Tex Heart Inst J

    (2003)
  • D. Mayfield et al.

    The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument

    Am J Psychiatry

    (1974)
  • H.B. Pinkofsky

    Mnemonics for DSM-IV personality disorders

    Psychiatr Serv

    (1997)
  • G.E. Boyle et al.

    An interactive taxonomy of MR imaging sequences

    Radiographics

    (2006)
  • W.R. Nitz

    MR imaging: acronyms and clinical applications

    Eur Radiol

    (1999)
  • J.S. Ross

    Newer sequences for spinal MR imaging: smorgasbord or succotash of acronyms?

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (1999)
  • D.S. Bell

    Epidemic occupational pseudo-illness: the plague of acronyms

    Curr Rev Pain

    (2000)
  • D.A. Bloom

    Acronyms, abbreviations and initialisms

    BJU Int

    (2000)
  • T.O. Cheng

    Acronym aggravation

    Br Heart J

    (1994)
  • T.O. Cheng

    Acronymophilia. BMJ

    (1994)
  • H.J. Farber

    On the abuse of acronyms

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2002)
  • Cited by (7)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding sources: None.

    Conflicts of interest: None declared.

    View full text