Journal Information
Visits
3
Vol. 21. Issue 2.
(February 2025)
Case Report
Full text access
Nontraumatic terminal ileal perforation in a patient with resistant palindromic rheumatism treated with sarilumab: A case report
Perforación ileal terminal no traumática en un paciente con reumatismo palindrómico refractario tratado con sarilumab: Reporte de caso
Visits
3
Anastasia Mocritcaiaa,
, Rocío García-Pérezb, Beatriz Fradea, Raimon Sanmartía
a Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
b Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestiva, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Abstract

Intestinal perforation, a rare complication of interleukin (IL)-6 therapy for immune-mediated diseases (mainly rheumatoid arthritis), typically manifests in the lower gastrointestinal tract, often in association with prior history of diverticulitis. Patients may present with acute abdominal pain and suspicion for this complication should remain high even in the absence of elevated C-reactive protein. We describe a 69-year-old female patient with a history of resistant seropositive palindromic rheumatism treated with sarilumab who developed a nontraumatic terminal ileal perforation.

Keywords:
Palindromic rheumatism
Sarilumab
Intestinal perforation
Resumen

La perforación intestinal, complicación poco frecuente del tratamiento con inhibidores de interleucina-6 para enfermedades inmunomediadas (principalmente artritis reumatoide), generalmente se manifiesta en el tracto gastrointestinal inferior, a menudo en asociación con antecedentes de diverticulitis. Los pacientes pueden presentar dolor abdominal agudo y la sospecha de esta complicación debe permanecer alta incluso en ausencia de elevación de proteína C reactiva. Describimos a una paciente de 69 años con antecedentes de reumatismo palindrómico seropositivo refractario tratada con sarilumab que desarrolló una perforación ileal terminal no traumática.

Palabras clave:
Reumatismo palindrómico
Sarilumab
Perforación intestinal
Full Text
Introduction

The association between interleukin (IL)-6 inhibitors and perforation of the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract in patients with a history of diverticulitis is well known. However, perforations can also occur at different sites. We present a patient with palindromic rheumatism (PR) treated with sarilumab who developed a spontaneous terminal ileal perforation complicated by faecal peritonitis.

Clinical observation

We present the case of a 69-year-old woman with a history of atypical seropositive PR with polyarticular inflammatory flares and fever (genetic study negative for autoinflammatory syndromes). Despite 10 years of conventional treatment (hydroxychloroquine, salazopyrin, methotrexate [MTX], and colchicine), the patient continued to experience flares without progression to chronic arthritis. As a result, treatment with sarilumab was initiated, with optimal clinical response. The patient reported no previous episodes of diverticulitis or relevant GI manifestations.

Fifteen months later, the patient experienced a spontaneous terminal ileal perforation, diagnosed by CT (Fig. 1), complicated by faecal peritonitis and bacteraemia (Bacteroides fragilis). The clinical presentation included vomiting and acute abdominal pain with elevated CRP. Ileal resection with lateral-lateral anastomosis was performed with subsequent conversion to terminal ileostomy due to anastomotic dehiscence and favourable postoperative recovery. Histopathological analysis revealed inflammation, vascular congestion, and fibrosis in the ileal wall without evidence of malignancy. Sarilumab was discontinued before surgery and colchicine was restarted, with no further flares for 18 months. However, the patient subsequently progressed to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and was started on MTX and low-dose glucocorticoids (GC). From that time to the present, and over a follow-up period of 2 years, the patient has remained clinically asymptomatic, with no new episodes of abdominal pain.

Figure 1.

Extensive diffuse pneumoperitoneum associated with a significant amount of free fluid predominantly in left parietocolic gutters (white arrow). In the distal ileum (approximately 10–15 cm from the ileocecal valve) there is a 5 mm parietal solution of continuity, suggestive of perforation (red arrow).

Discussion

Lower GI perforations, although rare, are a serious complication associated with IL-6 inhibitors. A higher incidence has been demonstrated with IL-6 inhibitors in patients with RA compared to conventional disease-modifying (cDMARDs) and biological (bDMARDs) antirheumatic drugs,1–3 in relation to mechanisms involving the role of IL-6 in maintaining the intestinal barrier by supporting epithelial proliferation, angiogenesis, and wound healing.4,5

One risk factor associated with lower GI perforation is a history of diverticulitis. However, an increased risk has also been described in the absence of diverticulitis.1 In addition, IL-6 inhibitor therapy itself has been associated with a higher rate of diverticulum development, possibly due to the role of IL-6 in colonic contraction.6 Additional risk factors should be considered, such as cumulative doses of GCs and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

Most lower GI perforation events have been reported in patients treated with tocilizumab, probably due to more extensive use, while few have been associated with sarilumab.7,8 In a safety analysis of several clinical trials of sarilumab in RA involving 2343 patients, only 4 cases of lower GI perforation were observed.9

Our case is unique in several ways. First, it is a seropositive PR with atypical findings without progression to RA at the time of GI perforation, despite a long follow-up. To our knowledge, this is the first case of PR treated with sarilumab. Second, the patient had no history of diverticulitis or inflammatory bowel disease.

Before the advent of the bDMARDs, GI perforations in patients with RA were mainly associated with NSAIDs.10 However, these complications predominantly affect the proximal small bowel, and our patient was not taking them.

Despite these atypical features, treatment was discontinued.

Conclusions

The presence of an acute abdomen in patients treated with IL-6 inhibitors should alert the clinician to the possibility of intestinal perforation, and imaging studies are recommended for diagnosis, bearing in mind that the systemic response may be masked by treatment. Additional risk factors such as the use of NSAIDs and GCs further increase the likelihood of this complication. Rapid diagnosis is essential due to the life-threatening nature of the condition.

References
[1]
A. Strangfeld, A. Richter, B. Siegmund, P. Herzer, K. Rockwitz, W. Demary, et al.
Risk for lower intestinal perforations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab in comparison to treatment with other biologic or conventional synthetic DMARDs.
Ann Rheum Dis., 76 (2017), pp. 504-510
[2]
F. Xie, H. Yun, S. Bernatsky, J.R. Curtis.
Brief report: risk of gastrointestinal perforation among rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving tofacitinib, tocilizumab, or other biologic treatments.
Arthritis Rheumatol, 68 (2016), pp. 2612-2617
[3]
A. Barbulescu, B. Delcoigne, J. Askling, T. Frisell.
Gastrointestinal perforations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Sweden: a nationwide cohort study.
[4]
K.A. Kuhn, N.A. Manieri, T.C. Liu, T.S. Stappenbeck.
IL-6 stimulates intestinal epithelial proliferation and repair after injury.
[5]
H. Nakahara, J. Song, M. Sugimoto, K. Hagihara, T. Kishimoto, K. Yoshizaki, et al.
Anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody therapy reduces vascular endothelial growth factor production in rheumatoid arthritis.
Arthritis Rheum, 48 (2003), pp. 1521-1529
[6]
C. Rempenault, C. Lukas, B. Combe, A. Herrero, I. Pane, T. Schaeverbeke, et al.
Risk of diverticulitis and gastrointestinal perforation in rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab compared to rituximab or abatacept.
Rheumatology., 61 (2022), pp. 953-962
[7]
R. Fleischmann, M.C. Genovese, Y. Lin, G. St John, D. van der Heijde, S. Wang, et al.
Long-term safety of sarilumab in rheumatoid arthritis: an integrated analysis with up to 7 years’ follow-up.
Rheumatology., 59 (2020), pp. 292-302
[8]
M.C. Genovese, D. van der Heijde, Y. Lin, G. St John, S. Wang, H. van Hoogstraten, et al.
Long-term safety and efficacy of sarilumab plus methotrexate on disease activity, physical function and radiographic progression: 5 years of sarilumab plus methotrexate treatment.
[9]
G.R. Burmester, V. Strand, A.J. Kivitz, C.C. Hu, S. Wang, H. van Hoogstraten, et al.
Long-term safety and efficacy of sarilumab with or without background csDMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis.
Rheumatology (Oxford)., 62 (2023), pp. 3268-3279
[10]
A. Lanas, M. Boers, J. Nuevo.
Gastrointestinal events in at-risk patients starting non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for rheumatic diseases: the EVIDENCE study of European routine practice.
Ann Rheum Dis., 74 (2015), pp. 675-681
Copyright © 2025. Sociedad Española de Reumatología (SER), Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología (CMR) and Elsevier España, S.L.U.
Download PDF
Idiomas
Reumatología Clínica (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?