Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 12. Issue 1.
Pages 39-46 (January - February 2016)
Vol. 12. Issue 1.
Pages 39-46 (January - February 2016)
Review article
DOI: 10.1016/j.reumae.2015.06.001
Full text access
Rituximab as Maintenance Therapy for ANCA Associated Vasculitis: How, When and Why?
Rituximab como terapia de mantenimiento en las vasculitis asociadas a ANCA: ¿cómo, cuándo y por qué?
Marco A. Alba, Luis Felipe Flores-Suárez
Corresponding author

Corresponding author.
Clínica de Vasculitis Sistémicas Primarias, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Mexico City, Mexico
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Tables (1)
Table 1. Studies Related to Maintenance Therapy With Rituximab (Fixed Intervals).

ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV) are chronic autoimmune diseases characterized by inflammation and destruction of small vessels. Rituximab is now licensed for use as a remission-induction agent in the treatment of these disorders. During recent years, several non-controlled studies have suggested that rituximab may be of value in maintaining disease remission in AAV. In these series, 3 techniques have been tried: “watch-and-wait”, repeated cycles in fixed intervals, or administration based on proposed biomarkers. More importantly, the results of the MAINRITSAN trial showed that this anti-CD20 agent is superior to azathioprine for preventing major relapses in AAV. This review summarizes current information regarding the effectiveness, timing, dosing, duration and safety of rituximab as a valid option for remission maintenance.

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis
Microscopic polyangiitis

Las vasculitis asociadas a ANCA son enfermedades autoinmunes crónicas que se caracterizan por inflamación y destrucción de vasos de pequeño tamaño. El rituximab es un tratamiento efectivo para la fase de inducción de estas patologías. Durante los últimos años, varios estudios no controlados han reportado que también es eficaz durante la fase de mantenimiento terapéutico. En estas series, el fármaco se administró solo durante las recaídas, a intervalos fijos o sobre la base en cambios en algunos biomarcadores. Los resultados del estudio MAINRITSAN mostraron que el rituximab es superior a la azatioprina como terapia de mantenimiento en estas enfermedades. Este trabajo de revisión resume la información más reciente sobre el uso de rituximab como opción para la fase de mantenimiento de las vasculitis asociadas a ANCA, detallando su efectividad, los diversos protocolos de administración, el perfil de seguridad y el uso potencial de biomarcadores para guiar el tratamiento.

Palabras clave:
Anticuerpos anticitoplasma de neutrófilo
Granulomatosis con poliangitis
Poliangitis microscópica
Full Text

Vasculitides associated with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) are a group of multisystemic diseases characterized by necrotizing inflammation of small vessels.1 The term ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV) includes granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA, Wegener's granulomatosis), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA, Churg-Strauss syndrome).1

Rituximab (RTX), a chimeric monoclonal antibody that integrates the anti-CD20 variable region of a murine immunoglobulin (Ig) with the constant region of a human IgG1, is one of the therapeutic alternatives approved for the induction phase in both GPA and MPA.2 In recent years, a number of studies have evaluated the use of RTX as maintenance therapy in these vasculitides.

In this review, we examine in detail the available information on the efficacy of RTX in maintaining remission in AAV. For this purpose, we conducted a search in the database of the United States National Library of Medicine (PubMed) for articles in English or Spanish published between January 2001 and January 2015. The terms, included in both languages, were: ANCA, vasculitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis and Wegener's granulomatosis in combination with rituximab, anti-CD, maintenance therapy and biological therapy. The relevant articles were obtained in their complete version and were reviewed and analyzed by both authors. We also identified noteworthy information in the abstracts of international rheumatology meetings held over the last 5 years. This report does not include the use of RTX in EGPA, which was recently reviewed in this journal.3

Maintenance Therapy for Vasculitides Associated With Antibodies Against Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antigens

The treatment of GPA and MPA consists of two different stages, an induction phase (with intensive immunosuppression) and a maintenance phase. The purpose of the latter is to prevent relapses and limit drug toxicity.

Despite the fact that initial treatment with cyclophosphamide (CPM), RTX or methotrexate (MTX) in combination with high-dose glucocorticoids (GC) achieves partial or complete remission in 75%–90% of the patients with AAV,4,5 11%–57% of them have relapses while they are being treated with azathioprine (AZA) or MTX alone.6–8 Although the majority are mild, some can be severe, and may provoke additional organ damage, permanent functional sequelae or even death. In addition to the complications inherent to the disease, 40% of the patients develop adverse effects related directly to the therapy employed, for example, osteoporosis or cardiovascular complications.9,10

With this scenario, the need to improve certain aspects of maintenance therapy is evident. Especially important among the unresolved matters are: (1) optimization of dose reduction and duration of therapy with the drugs employed, as most of the relapses occur during the tapering of GC and/or immunosuppressive agents (IS) or once they have been discontinued11; (2) early identification of patients at high risk for relapse, for example, those with GPA, upper respiratory tract disease, PR3-ANCA positivity, nasal colonization by Staphylococcus aureus or persistence of ANCA when AZA is initiated12–16; (3) development of individualized treatments in which not only the clinical and ethnical differences are taken into account, but the histological, serological and genetic associations as well11,17; and (4) evaluation of new drugs, such as abatacept (, NCT02108860), belimumab (BREVAS study, NCT01663623) or RTX, the drug being evaluated here.

The Basis for the Use of Rituximab in Vasculitides Associated With Antibodies Directed Against Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antigen

The evidence at different levels indicates that the B lymphocytes play a very important role in AAV: (1) the number of activated B cells is associated with the disease activity and severity18; (2) ANCA, antibodies possibly involved in the pathogenesis of these vasculitides, are produced by B lymphocytes19,20; (3) in nasal, lung and orbital biopsies from patients with GPA, self-reactive B cells have been identified, adjacent to PR3-ANCA-positive cells, which form structures similar to lymphoid follicles that disappear after treatment with RTX21–24; and (4) B lymphocytes are the main target of CPM, a drug that is essential in the treatment of these vasculitides.25

The binding of RTX to CD20 provokes the rapid and sustained depletion of premature and mature B lymphocytes (reducing the plasma cell precursors) through diverse mechanisms, which include antibody-mediated cellular cytotoxicity (mediated by macrophages and natural killer cells), complement-mediated lysis, induction of apoptosis and sensitization to GC and cytotoxic agents.26 Moreover, the drug is capable of inhibiting the interaction between self-reactive B and T cells and increasing the regulatory T lymphocyte population.27–30

Rituximab as Maintenance Therapy

Information on the use of RTX as maintenance therapy derives from the MAINRITSAN (Maintenance of Remission using Rituximab in Systemic ANCA-associated vasculitis) trial, a recent randomized clinical trial, as well as from certain observational studies (Table 1).

Table 1.

Studies Related to Maintenance Therapy With Rituximab (Fixed Intervals).

Reference-year  Follow-up (months)  Study population  Inductiona  RTX maintenance regimena  Relapses  Safety  Comment 
39 2010  12 months (n=39)24 months (n=20)  GPA/MPARec/Ref(n=39)  CPM or RTX  1g every 4 months for 2 years  7.6%Relapse rate: 5.0/100 patient-years  5% severe AE  Decrease of 87% in 30% of patients with IS 
41 2012  38 (21–97)  GPA (85%)/MPARec/Ref (90%)New Dx (10%)(n=28)  CPM or RTX or MTX  375mg/m2 every 6 months (n=13)1g biannual (n=4)1g every 12 months (n=3)Other regimens (n=8)Average infusions: 4 (2–10)  7%Relapse rate: 2.0/100 patient-years  1 severe AE (infection)3 patients with mild infections  Concomitant use of IS in more than 50% of the patients treated with RTX 
38 2012  52.8 (32.4–74.4)  GPARec/Ref(n=53)  CPM or RTX  375mg/m2/week×4 (90%) or 1g every 2 weeks×2 (10%) when there was reconstitution of B lymphocytes or increase in PR3-ANCA vs RTX only in relapses  0% patients treated according to a preventive strategy vs 32 relapses in patients not managed by protocol  30 infections (9 in respiratory tract)  Treatment based on biomarkersAll the flares preceded by increase in ANCA or B lymphocytes 
37 2012  55 (19–62)  GPA/MPARec/Ref(n=73)  Multiple, including biologic  1g every 6 months×2 years (n=45) vs RTX only in relapses (n=28)Cumulative dose in patients treated regularly: 6 (2–11) g  12% in patients treated according to a preventive strategy vs 72% not managed by protocol at 24 months (26% vs 81% at 48 months)  Severe AE 47% RTX vs 32% non-RTX (severe infections 27% vs 21%)  Considerable decrease in GC, 38% discontinue completelyIS are discontinued in 95% 
45 2013  47 (2–88)  GPARec/Ref (80%)New Dx (20%)(n=35)  RTX  1g every 15 days once a year1g biannualCumulative dose: 8 (2–13) g  23%Relapse rate: 6.6/100 patient-years  26% severe infections37% discontinue RTX  GC reduced from 22mg to 5mg/day, 21% discontinue completely 
44 2014  34.2 (8–60)  GPARec/Ref (95%)New Dx (5%) (n=66)  RTX  500mg every 6 months×1.5 yearsCumulative dose: 4.6±1.712%Relapse rate: 11.2/100 patient-yearsOnly 5 patients relapsed in the first 2 years of treatment  21 severe AE13.6% of the patients develop infections  50% develop granulomatous diseaseConsiderable reduction in GC with treatment 
43 2014  59 (44.5–73.3)  GPA (90%)/MPARec/Ref (97%)New Dx (3%)(n=69)  CPM or RTX  1g every 6 months×2 yearsCumulative dose: 613%40% after complete discontinuation of RTX (34 months average continuous remission)  93 severe AE in 36 patients29% severe infections (57% in respiratory tract)  90% of the patients are able to discontinue IS and 48% GCIncludes patients from series (4) 
40 2014  84 months  GPA (43%)/MPARec/Ref and new Dx(n=172)  CPM or RTX  1g every 4 months  20% (severe relapses 5%)Average in remission: 2.1 years  14% severe infections (36% pulmonary)  Survival comparable to general populationIncludes patients from series (1) 
42 2014  18 (12–37)  GPA (88%)/MPARec/Ref(n=80)  Multiple, including RTX  375mg/m2 every 6 months (26%)500mg every 6 months (14%)1g every 6 months (11%)Others  20% treated with RTX vs 44% without the drug  22 severe AE15% infections5% patients died  Demonstrates the wide variability in RTX administration 

All the reported series are observational cohorts from a single center, except (9) (multicenter retrospective).

AE: adverse events; CPM: cyclophosphamide; Dx: diagnosis; GC: glucocorticoids; GPA: granulomatosis with polyangiitis; IS: immunosuppressive agents; MPA: microscopic polyangiitis; MTX: methotrexate; Rec/Ref: recurrent/refractory; Ref: reference; RTX: rituximab.

Modified from Keogh et al.54 and McAdoo and Pusey.83


Both induction therapy and maintenance therapy included GC.

Clinical Trials

MAINRITSAN is the first and only randomized study to compare RTX and AZA as maintenance therapy in patients with GPA (n=87), MPA (n=23) or renal-limited vasculitis (n=5).31 The study (controlled, open and multicenter) included 115 patients (80% with new diagnosis, 20% with recurrent disease) in complete remission after induction therapy with GC and CPM. The maintenance protocol was based on the administration of prednisone (approximately 5mg/day for at least 18 months) in combination with AZA (n=58, 2mg/kg/day for 1 year, 1.5mg/kg/day for 6 months and 1.0mg/kg/day for the last 4 months) or RTX (n=57, 500mg initially on days 0 and 14 and, thereafter, every 6 months, for a total of 5 applications). The percentage of patients with severe relapses (recurrence or worsening of the vasculitis with manifestations that were life-threatening or affected an essential organ, like the brain or heart) after 28 months of follow-up (primary endpoint) was 5% (n=3) among patients treated with RTX and 29% (n=17) among those treated with AZA, demonstrating a clear superiority of the monoclonal antibody (P=.002). Among the patients who relapsed with AZA, in 8 it occurred during the first year; in 2, between months 12 and 22; and in 7, after the complete discontinuation of the medication (months 24–28). In the case of RTX, there was 1 relapse per month in months 8, 22 and 24. With respect to minor relapses, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the rate of adverse events or the incidence of infections.

Although the results of the study with RTX are very promising, with one of the lowest rates of relapse reported in these vasculitides, it strikes us as interesting that 41% of the flares recorded in the AZA group occurred when the patients were no longer receiving the medication, possibly causing the therapeutic effect of the drug to be underestimated. However, the protocol for maintenance with AZA is similar to that utilized previously in two large-scale clinical trials involving the same type of patients, and the results of which are similar to those observed in the MAINRITSAN trial.5,8 As occurs with other IS,32 treatment with AZA or RTX for a longer period of time than that evaluated in the MAINRITSAN trial could be related to a higher rate of sustained remissions, a possibility that should be examined in clinical trials with longer follow-up times.

In short, the MAINRITSAN trial showed that the combination of low doses of GC and RTX at fixed intervals (every 6 months, which is the average duration of the therapeutic effect33) can be considered a valid, effective and safe alternative for maintenance of remission in patients with AAV, mainly those with newly diagnosed GPA. At the present time, two clinical trials to evaluate RTX as maintenance therapy are being developed. The first, MAINRITSAN 2 ( NCT01731561), will compare two strategies for RTX administration (500mg at fixed intervals of 6 months vs 500mg whenever increases in CD19+ lymphocytes or ANCA are detected). The other study, RITAZAREM (Rituximab Vasculitis Maintenance Study) (NCT01697267), will evaluate patients with refractory AAV receiving RTX (1g every 4 months) or AZA for 2 years.

Observational Studies

The studies that are to be reviewed below disclose certain differences and limitations that should be taken into account for a correct interpretation of the conclusions derived from them. These series evaluated heterogeneous populations, the dose and regimen of RTX administration varied, and there are differences in the reported maintenance protocols, as the drug was utilized: (1) at fixed intervals in a so-called prevention strategy; (2) depending on serological markers, such as an increase in the ANCA level or B lymphocyte reconstitution; or (3) only at the time of relapses.

Rituximab at Fixed Intervals (Preventive)

This strategy has become that most widely used in recent years, and rates of sustained remission (follow-up of 36–48 months) of 74%–100% have been reported (in comparison with the 19%–56% in patients not treated regularly with RTX).34–45Table 1 summarizes the features of the major studies.

Although the doses and intervals vary, the administration of 1g every 4–6 months for 2 years is the regimen that is most frequently used.37,39–42 In some protocols, RTX was continued for more than 24 months, meaning that these patients may have received ≥10 cycles of the drug.38,40,43 In contrast to the MAINRITSAN randomized clinical trial, in the great majority of the observational studies, the predominant study population consisted of patients with recurrent or refractory GPA (mean age of 40.5–52 years), and the number of newly diagnosed patients was lower.37,41,44

With this form of administration, the average time between relapses and the first and last doses of the monoclonal antibody was 11–29 months and 9–15 months, respectively.34,37,42–45 Interestingly, a study with an extensive follow-up period (5 years) demonstrated that, after discontinuation of the medication (24 months), 50% of the patients remained in sustained remission, whereas the remainder relapsed 3 years after the last dose of RTX.43

With regard to drug toxicity, although the cumulative dose of the drug is greater in these patients, the rate of adverse effects (including infections) is similar to that reported in studies in which RTX was administered only during relapses.34–45 However, it should be stressed that one limitation of preventive maintenance with RTX is the risk of overtreatment of those patients (approximately 40%) who have prolonged remission after a single cycle of induction with RTX.46 Unfortunately, to date there is no way to identify those patients.

Another important datum derived from these studies is that, in the majority of the reported patients, the preventive use of RTX permits the reduction of the prednisone dose (initially 20–30mg/once daily to <5mg/once daily).34,40,41,43,44 Moreover, 70%–90% of the patients treated were able to completely discontinue all other immunosuppressive therapy (mycophenolate mofetil, AZA or MTX) and 21%–48% were able to discontinue treatment with GC.37,39,41,43,45

In this respect, it is important to point out the adjuvant role that the classical IS could play in maintenance therapy with RTX, mainly in patients with recurrent or refractory disease. The administration of AZA, MTX, leflunomide or mycophenolate mofetil in combination with RTX as maintenance therapy has been reported in a number of uncontrolled studies.39,40,44,45,47 A study with a considerable number of GPA patients (n=89) reported that, after 2 years of follow-up, those patients treated with AZA or MTX in combination with RTX had a significantly lower rate of relapses than those treated with RTX alone (55% vs 70%, P=.04).47 These results contrast with those of the subanalysis of 40 patients from the series of Rhee et al.,39 in which the systematic discontinuation of the IS prior to starting treatment with RTX was not associated with an increased frequency of flares. With respect to the therapeutic complications, some studies have reported that the concomitant use of mycophenolate mofetil and, mainly, CPM is related to a higher predisposition toward severe infections,45 whereas, in other series, there was no increase in the number of adverse events.47 At the present time, the available data do not lead to a clear conclusion about the adjuvant use of IS with RTX; however, it is advisable to avoid the combination of the latter with CPM at full doses, due to the increase in the number of severe adverse events.48

Rituximab Based on Biomarker Levels

A retrospective study of GPA patients (n=53) with refractory disease (40% granulomatous activity, 60% vasculitic) compared the administration of RTX only in the case of new relapse (36%) with an individualized protocol (64%) involving infusion of the drug on the basis of the increase in PR3-ANCA or B lymphocytes in serial measurements.38 At the end of the follow-up period (median 4.4 years, interquartile range 2.7–6.2), there were no episodes of reactivation among the patients treated on the basis of the change in ANCA titer or B lymphocyte repopulation (average of 4 cycles of RTX received) in contrast to 32 relapses (relapse rate: 13.8/100 patient years) in the group of patients in which the drug was not administered on a regular basis.

Rituximab in Relapses

The follow-up of the patients treated with a single RTX cycle in the RAVE (Rituximab in ANCA-associated vasculitis) trial demonstrated that, although the results with this approach are similar to those obtained with the CPM/AZA combination, it is not sufficient to maintain prolonged remission, as approximately 60% of the patients will relapse during follow-up (18 months).13,46

In the light of this evidence, at some centers, retreatment with RTX was adopted as a therapeutic measure only in cases of relapse, and it was observed that the drug (at the dose for lymphoma or rheumatoid arthritis [RA]) is usually equally as effective (and safe) as the initial anti-CD20 therapy.23,36,49 In the open phase of the RAVE trial,5,50 26 patients (92% GPA) received RTX for severe relapses between month 6 and month 18 of the study, and remission was achieved in approximately 90% of the cases (50% were also able to discontinue the concomitant use of GC). These studies have also shown that RTX is more effective than CPM in maintaining remission in patients with previous recurrent disease.46

Although treatment of relapses with RTX appears to be effective, this approach to the administration has the disadvantage that the patients are exposed to the damage derived from the disease, and possibly to higher cumulative doses of prednisone (a drug that is usually increased as an initial measure). Moreover, given that RTX is usually administered full-dose for induction, this could entail an additional economic cost as compared with single, smaller doses administered once or twice a year, as in the prevention protocols.

Predictors of Relapses Following Treatment With Rituximab

One persistent question is whether there are biomarkers capable of accurately predicting which patients will relapse during treatment with RTX. Up to now, conclusions based on the evaluation of the two laboratory tests most widely examined (B lymphocyte and ANCA levels) are quite unclear,36,39,45,51 with publications that argue in favor38,49,52,53 and against36,37 their utility.

Determination of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies

In the vast majority of the reported series, it has not been possible to establish a relationship between the change in ANCA levels and the development of recurrence.5,34,36,37,39,41,44,45,50,54–56 In these studies, the percentages of patients who became ANCA-positive or in whom the levels increased, and who had relapses or remained in remission ranged from 33% to 77% and from 38% to 66%, respectively, which shows that the sensitivity of this variable is too low to serve as the basis for decisions on maintenance therapy. The only study that found an association between ANCA levels and recurrences reported that seroconversion to ANCA positivity during the post-RTX period was associated with a 7-fold higher risk of having severe relapses.43

With respect to the specificity of ANCA, it has recently been reported that the presence of PR3-ANCA, but not a change in the levels of these antibodies, was related to higher long-term risk of relapses.37,43,46,50

One important conclusion derived from the RAVE extension studies is that the possibility of RTX-treated patients having a relapse is extremely low as long as the assays for ANCA are negative and B lymphocytes remain undetectable in peripheral blood.46,50 In fact, only 1 of the 76 patients included in these studies had a flare while these two markers were below the level of detection.

B Lymphocytes

As in the case of ANCA, the levels of these cells in peripheral blood have not been shown to be an accurate enough test for the prediction of flares.31,37,39,41,44,56 Depending on the study analyzed, the reported finding is that approximately 50% of the relapses occur prior to B cell repopulation, that 44%–88% of the patients who relapse have detectable B lymphocytes, and that between 25% and 66% of those patients in whom normal levels of B lymphocytes are detected do not have relapses.5,34,36,37,45,46 Moreover, the time between B cell reconstitution and the development of relapses is not constant either; some patients relapse coinciding with lymphocyte repopulation, whereas in others, it may take some time (average 80±85 days).57

One of the few series in which a good correlation was found between AAV reactivation and B lymphocyte repopulation reported that the development of flares (n=32) was always preceded by the detection of these cells in peripheral blood, with a median between the two events of 8.5 months.38 Interestingly, in this report, all the recurrences were preceded by or associated with an increase in PR3-ANCA.

A recent report found that those patients in whom B lymphocytes were detectable within the first year after treatment with RTX had shorter periods of remission than those in whom repopulation took over 12 months.43

The possible hypotheses to explain the poor correlation between the number of B lymphocytes and the AAV activity include: (1) the existence of niches or “sanctuary sites” for self-reactive B cells in tissues or sites of active inflammation (mainly granulomatous)24; these cell groups would be protected from the pharmacological action of RTX, remaining active before an increase in lymphocytes was observed in peripheral blood21,58; (2) changed dynamics in B cell levels due to a synergic effect between RTX and other conventional IS, such as AZA or CPM, that are frequently administered to patients with resistant or refractory disease59; (3) racial differences between the populations studied, as the elimination of the B lymphocytes depends not only on the RTX dose, but on polymorphisms in the cell surface receptors (FcγRIIIa)60; and (4) differing definitions from one study to another, with varied absolute values for peripheral blood B cells and diverse phenotypes evaluated (CD19+ or CD20+), as a consequence of the use of detection techniques (flow cytometry) with greater or lesser sensitivity.36

New Biomarkers

A recent publication stated that the detailed phenotypic analysis of subpopulations of B lymphocytes might have the potential to predict relapses. In a study of 54 patients with AAV, it was observed that when <30% of the B lymphocyte repopulation was constituted by CD5+ cells (possibly regulatory B cells), the time to the first recurrence was shorter. This cell subpopulation also correlated negatively with the general disease activity.61 Similarly, it has been reported that, when the B lymphocyte reconstitution is composed mainly of memory cells, there is an increased risk of recurrences.53 This is similar to what occurs in systemic lupus erythematosus, in which repopulation with a higher proportion of CD27+ B lymphocytes (memory cells) has been related to a higher risk of flares.62,63


The experience accumulated in the treatment of hematologic neoplasms and RA indicates that RTX has a good margin of safety. The situation in AAV appears to be similar, although the long-term safety of repeated RTX administration has yet to be established, as the majority of the studies have a relatively short follow-up period.

In maintenance studies, anti-CD20+ therapy provoked adverse effects in 13%–60% of the patients,37,42,43 with severe infections, hypogammaglobulinemia, severe neutropenia or a lack of efficacy being the main causes of discontinuation, temporary or definitive, of the drug.44,45

Reactions Associated With the Administration of Rituximab

Mild allergic reactions are the adverse effect most frequently observed (10%–50% of the patients).33,64,51 They usually occur within the first 24h after treatment, and the manifestations are fever, chills, hyper- or hypotension, fatigue, headache, erythema, urticaria, nausea and/or vomiting.33,51


These are the most important complications, and mild or severe infections are reported in 7%–50% of the patients (incidence of 2.6–15.5/100 patient years, similar to that of CPM).5,36,37,42,46,49,50,56,57,65–67 The most common infections are those of the respiratory tract (mainly of viral origin) and the urinary tract, followed by mucocutaneous infections (herpes simplex, herpes zoster and candidiasis).33,36,37,41,46,49,50,65 Although the majority of these episodes are mild, 14%–27% are severe and 3%–29% of the patients develop chronic infections.36,42–45 Infections due to opportunistic microorganisms are rare, and RTX is a safe alternative in patients with a history of tuberculosis.38,39,68

The reported risk factors for the development of severe infections in these patients are high cumulative doses of CPM and the combination of RTX with other cytotoxic drugs.45,69 Although the presence of neutropenia or hypogammaglobulinemia could be associated with increased susceptibility to infectious complications, at present, there is no convincing evidence to prove this.37,38,44


This adverse effect has been reported in 26%–41% of the patients at some point during maintenance with RTX, but is a transient and self-limiting event in more than 50% of the cases.37,43,70

In the majority of the patients, the most marked decrease in the immunoglobulin level was observed during the initial treatment cycles (60% of all the episodes occurring with total doses ≤2g and 70% of those with doses ≤6g).71

Although hypogammaglobulinemia is usually mild to moderate, approximately 7% of the patients have a severe and/or permanent deficiency, requiring discontinuation of the drug and its substitution by intravenous gammaglobulin.43,44,57,51,72 In this respect, this adverse effect has not been directly related to an increase in the development of severe infections,37,38,44 although it could be a contributing factor in patients with other predisposing conditions.73

Among the risk factors that have been associated with the presence of hypogammaglobulinemia, we point out a high cumulative dose of CPM (prior to the initiation of RTX), low baseline immunoglobulin and CD4+ levels, and the concomitant use of the monoclonal antibody with cytotoxic drugs.57,70 Interestingly, some studies have related hypogammaglobulinemia to the number of RTX cycles.74,75 However, this finding has not been corroborated in series with longer follow-up periods.57,51,70,71

Late-onset Neutropenia

This develops in 3%–5% of the patients and is generally transient.5 In the majority of the cases, it has no effect on the patient's clinical status, although there may be cases in which the use of a colony-stimulating factor is required.40,44,76,77

Other Adverse Effects

The published literature includes cases of pancytopenia,33,39 macular edema78 and severe pulmonary complications (interstitial disease) in patients with AAV.48 Moreover, there are reports of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and RA,79,80 and a case (unpublished) of this complication in AAV has been detected.48


Rituximab has been shown to be effective and safe for use as maintenance therapy in AAV, both in recently diagnosed disease and in patients with frequent relapses.48 On the basis of the information published to date, the administration of 500mg at fixed intervals (twice a year) could be the recommended mode of administration, because of its marked efficacy and safety. However, lower doses may also prove to be effective in the maintenance of remission, as has been reported in other diseases,81,82 or at wider intervals between applications. This could be guided with the utilization of more reliable biomarkers, as well as the individual response to the treatment.

It still remains to be determined whether the drug is more effective in specific groups, for example, in women of childbearing age or patients susceptible to frequent relapses or with a higher risk of infections. The optimal duration of maintenance with RTX should also be studied. In this respect, and by analogy with conventional treatment, a period of between 18 and 24 months is recommended, although, at the present time, there is nothing conclusive regarding this question.48 Finally, we still have yet to know what effect cumulative doses can have and the economic impact of different administration protocols.83

Ethical DisclosuresProtection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

J.C. Jennette, R.J. Falk, P.A. Bacon, N. Basu, M.C. Cid, F. Ferrario, et al.
2012 revised international Chapel Hill consensus conference nomenclature of vasculitides.
Arthritis Rheum, 65 (2013), pp. 1-11
M.A. Alba, L.F. Flores-Suarez.
Rituximab for the treatment of ANCA associated vasculitis: the future today?.
Reumatol Clin, 7 (2011), pp. S41-S46
S.A. Munoz, I.J. Gandino, A.O. Orden, A. Allievi.
Rituximab in the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.
Reumatol Clin, 11 (2015), pp. 165-169
K. De Groot, L. Harper, D.R. Jayne, L.F. Flores Suarez, G. Gregorini, W.L. Gross, et al.
Pulse versus daily oral cyclophosphamide for induction of remission in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a randomized trial.
Ann Intern Med, 150 (2009), pp. 670-680
J.H. Stone, P.A. Merkel, R. Spiera, P. Seo, C.A. Langford, G.S. Hoffman, et al.
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
N Engl J Med, 363 (2010), pp. 221-232
T.F. Hiemstra, M. Walsh, A. Mahr, C.O. Savage, K. de Groot, L. Harper, et al.
Mycophenolate mofetil vs azathioprine for remission maintenance in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a randomized controlled trial.
JAMA, 304 (2010), pp. 2381-2388
D. Jayne, N. Rasmussen, K. Andrassy, P. Bacon, J.W. Tervaert, J. Dadoniene, et al.
A randomized trial of maintenance therapy for vasculitis associated with antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies.
N Engl J Med, 349 (2003), pp. 36-44
C. Pagnoux, A. Mahr, M.A. Hamidou, J.J. Boffa, M. Ruivard, J.P. Ducroix, et al.
Azathioprine or methotrexate maintenance for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
N Engl J Med, 359 (2008), pp. 2790-2803
C. Mukhtyar, L. Guillevin, M.C. Cid, B. Dasgupta, K. de Groot, W. Gross, et al.
EULAR recommendations for the management of primary small and medium vessel vasculitis.
Ann Rheum Dis, 68 (2009), pp. 310-317
S. Furuta, D. Jayne.
Emerging therapies in antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis.
Curr Opin Rheumatol, 26 (2014), pp. 1-6
U. Schonermarck, W.L. Gross, K. de Groot.
Treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Nat Rev Nephrol, 10 (2014), pp. 25-36
C.G. Kallenberg, E. Brouwer, J.J. Weening, J.W. Tervaert.
Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies: current diagnostic and pathophysiological potential.
Kidney Int, 46 (1994), pp. 1-15
E.M. Miloslavsky, U. Specks, P.A. Merkel, P. Seo, R. Spiera, C.A. Langford, et al.
Clinical outcomes of remission induction therapy for severe antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.
Arthritis Rheum, 65 (2013), pp. 2441-2449
M. Walsh, O. Flossmann, A. Berden, K. Westman, P. Hoglund, C. Stegeman, et al.
Risk factors for relapse of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.
Arthritis Rheum, 64 (2012), pp. 542-548
C.A. Stegeman, J.W. Tervaert, W.J. Sluiter, W.L. Manson, P.E. de Jong, C.G. Kallenberg.
Association of chronic nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and higher relapse rates in Wegener granulomatosis.
Ann Intern Med, 120 (1994), pp. 12-17
M.C. Slot, J.W. Tervaert, M.M. Boomsma, C.A. Stegeman.
Positive classic antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (C-ANCA) titer at switch to azathioprine therapy associated with relapse in proteinase 3-related vasculitis.
Arthritis Rheum, 51 (2004), pp. 269-273
P.A. Lyons, T.F. Rayner, S. Trivedi, J.U. Holle, R.A. Watts, D.R. Jayne, et al.
Genetically distinct subsets within ANCA-associated vasculitis.
N Engl J Med, 367 (2012), pp. 214-223
E.R. Popa, C.A. Stegeman, N.A. Bos, C.G. Kallenberg, J.W. Tervaert.
Differential B- and T-cell activation in Wegener's granulomatosis.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 103 (1999), pp. 885-894
J.C. Jennette, H. Xiao, R.J. Falk.
Pathogenesis of vascular inflammation by anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies.
J Am Soc Nephrol, 17 (2006), pp. 1235-1242
H. Xiao, P. Heeringa, P. Hu, Z. Liu, M. Zhao, Y. Aratani, et al.
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies specific for myeloperoxidase cause glomerulonephritis and vasculitis in mice.
J Clin Invest, 110 (2002), pp. 955-963
E.R. Popa, C.F. Franssen, P.C. Limburg, M.G. Huitema, C.G. Kallenberg, J.W. Tervaert.
In vitro cytokine production and proliferation of T cells from patients with anti-proteinase 3- and antimyeloperoxidase-associated vasculitis, in response to proteinase 3 and myeloperoxidase.
Arthritis Rheum, 46 (2002), pp. 1894-1904
J. Voswinkel, A. Mueller, J.A. Kraemer, P. Lamprecht, K. Herlyn, K. Holl-Ulrich, et al.
B lymphocyte maturation in Wegener's granulomatosis: a comparative analysis of VH genes from endonasal lesions.
Ann Rheum Dis, 65 (2006), pp. 859-864
S.R. Taylor, A.D. Salama, L. Joshi, C.D. Pusey, S.L. Lightman.
Rituximab is effective in the treatment of refractory ophthalmic Wegener's granulomatosis.
Arthritis Rheum, 60 (2009), pp. 1540-1547
A.J. Ferraro, S.W. Smith, D. Neil, C.O. Savage.
Relapsed Wegener's granulomatosis after rituximab therapy — B cells are present in new pathological lesions despite persistent “depletion” of peripheral blood.
Nephrol Dial Transplant, 23 (2008), pp. 3030-3032
T.R. Cupps, L.C. Edgar, A.S. Fauci.
Suppression of human B lymphocyte function by cyclophosphamide.
J Immunol, 128 (1982), pp. 2453-2457
J. Golay, L. Zaffaroni, T. Vaccari, M. Lazzari, G.M. Borleri, S. Bernasconi, et al.
Biologic response of B lymphoma cells to anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab in vitro: CD55 and CD59 regulate complement-mediated cell lysis.
Blood, 95 (2000), pp. 3900-3908
M. Walsh, D. Jayne.
Targeting the B cell in vasculitis.
Pediatr Nephrol, 24 (2009), pp. 1267-1275
C.O. Bingham 3rd, R.J. Looney, A. Deodhar, N. Halsey, M. Greenwald, C. Codding, et al.
Immunization responses in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with rituximab: results from a controlled clinical trial.
Arthritis Rheum, 62 (2010), pp. 64-74
S.N. Liossis, P.P. Sfikakis.
Rituximab-induced B cell depletion in autoimmune diseases: potential effects on T cells.
Clin Immunol, 127 (2008), pp. 280-285
M.J. Leandro, I. de la Torre.
Translational mini-review series on b cell-directed therapies: the pathogenic role of B cells in autoantibody-associated autoimmune diseases — lessons from B cell-depletion therapy.
Clin Exp Immunol, 157 (2009), pp. 191-197
L. Guillevin, C. Pagnoux, A. Karras, C. Khouatra, O. Aumaitre, P. Cohen, et al.
Rituximab versus azathioprine for maintenance in ANCA-associated vasculitis.
N Engl J Med, 371 (2014), pp. 1771-1780
J. Springer, B. Nutter, C.A. Langford, G.S. Hoffman, A. Villa-Forte.
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's): impact of maintenance therapy duration.
Medicine (Baltimore), 93 (2014), pp. 82-90
T. Pham, B. Fautrel, J.E. Gottenberg, P. Goupille, E. Hachulla, C. Masson, et al.
Rituximab (MabThera) therapy and safety management. Clinical tool guide.
Joint Bone Spine, 75 (2008), pp. S1-S99
P. Moog, M. Probst, C. Kuechle, C. Hauser, U. Heemann, K. Thuermel.
Single-dose rituximab for remission induction and maintenance therapy in ANCA-associated vasculitis: a retrospective analysis of 17 patients.
Scand J Rheumatol, 43 (2014), pp. 519-523
R.J. Jose, C. Chrysochou, A.E. Shurrab, D. New, G.N. Wood.
Rituximab for rescue and maintenance therapy in rapidly progressive life-threatening antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated systemic vasculitis.
Scand J Urol Nephrol, 44 (2010), pp. 459-462
R.B. Jones, A.J. Ferraro, A.N. Chaudhry, P. Brogan, A.D. Salama, K.G. Smith, et al.
A multicenter survey of rituximab therapy for refractory antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.
Arthritis Rheum, 60 (2009), pp. 2156-2168
R.M. Smith, R.B. Jones, M.J. Guerry, S. Laurino, F. Catapano, A. Chaudhry, et al.
Rituximab for remission maintenance in relapsing antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.
Arthritis Rheum, 64 (2012), pp. 3760-3769
R. Cartin-Ceba, J.M. Golbin, K.A. Keogh, T. Peikert, M. Sanchez-Menendez, S.R. Ytterberg, et al.
Rituximab for remission induction and maintenance in refractory granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's): ten-year experience at a single center.
Arthritis Rheum, 64 (2012), pp. 3770-3778
E.P. Rhee, K.A. Laliberte, J.L. Niles.
Rituximab as maintenance therapy for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 5 (2010), pp. 1394-1400
W.F. Pendergraft 3rd, F.B. Cortazar, J. Wenger, A.P. Murphy, E.P. Rhee, K.A. Laliberte, et al.
Long-term maintenance therapy using rituximab-induced continuous B-cell depletion in patients with ANCA vasculitis.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 9 (2014), pp. 736-744
C. Roubaud-Baudron, C. Pagnoux, N. Meaux-Ruault, A. Grasland, A.J.L.E.G. Zoulim, et al.
Rituximab maintenance therapy for granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis.
J Rheumatol, 39 (2012), pp. 125-130
P. Charles, A. Neel, N. Tieulie, A. Hot, G. Pugnet, O. Decaux, et al.
Rituximab for induction and maintenance treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitides: a multicentre retrospective study on 80 patients.
Rheumatology (Oxford), 53 (2014), pp. 532-539
F. Alberici, R.M. Smith, R.B. Jones, D.M. Roberts, L.C. Willcocks, A. Chaudhry, et al.
Long-term follow-up of patients who received repeat-dose rituximab as maintenance therapy for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Rheumatology (Oxford), 54 (2015), pp. 1153-1160
A.L. Calich, X. Puechal, G. Pugnet, J. London, B. Terrier, P. Charles, et al.
Rituximab for induction and maintenance therapy in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's). Results of a single-center cohort study on 66 patients.
J Autoimmun, 50 (2014), pp. 135-141
E. Besada, W. Koldingsnes, J.C. Nossent.
Long-term efficacy and safety of pre-emptive maintenance therapy with rituximab in granulomatosis with polyangiitis: results from a single centre.
Rheumatology (Oxford), 52 (2013), pp. 2041-2047
U. Specks, P.A. Merkel, P. Seo, R. Spiera, C.A. Langford, G.S. Hoffman, et al.
Efficacy of remission-induction regimens for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
N Engl J Med, 369 (2013), pp. 417-427
L. Azar, J. Springer, C.A. Langford, G.S. Hoffman.
Rituximab with or without a conventional maintenance agent in the treatment of relapsing granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's): a retrospective single-center study.
Arthritis Rheumatol, 66 (2014), pp. 2862-2870
P. Charles, B. Bienvenu, B. Bonnotte, P. Gobert, P. Godmer, E. Hachulla, et al.
Rituximab: Recommendations of the French Vasculitis Study Group (FVSG) for induction and maintenance treatments of adult, antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated necrotizing vasculitides.
Presse Med, 42 (2013), pp. 1317-1330
K.A. Keogh, S.R. Ytterberg, F.C. Fervenza, K.A. Carlson, D.R. Schroeder, U. Specks.
Rituximab for refractory Wegener's granulomatosis: report of a prospective, open-label pilot trial.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 173 (2006), pp. 180-187
E.M. Miloslavsky, U. Specks, P.A. Merkel, P. Seo, R. Spiera, C.A. Langford, et al.
Rituximab for the treatment of relapses in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.
Arthritis Rheumatol, 66 (2014), pp. 3151-3159
M.J. Guerry, P. Brogan, I.N. Bruce, D.P. D’Cruz, L. Harper, R. Luqmani, et al.
Recommendations for the use of rituximab in anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis.
Rheumatology (Oxford), 51 (2012), pp. 634-643
R. Stasi, E. Stipa, G. del Poeta, S. Amadori, A.C. Newland, D. Provan.
Long-term observation of patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis treated with rituximab.
Rheumatology (Oxford), 45 (2006), pp. 1432-1436
N. Venhoff, L. Niessen, M. Kreuzaler, A.G. Rolink, F. Hassler, M. Rizzi, et al.
Reconstitution of the peripheral B lymphocyte compartment in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitides treated with rituximab for relapsing or refractory disease.
Autoimmunity, 47 (2014), pp. 401-408
K.A. Keogh, M.E. Wylam, J.H. Stone, U. Specks.
Induction of remission by B lymphocyte depletion in eleven patients with refractory antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.
Arthritis Rheum, 52 (2005), pp. 262-268
U. Specks, J.H. Stone.
Long-term efficacy and safety results of the RAVE trial.
Clin Exp Immunol, 164 (2011), pp. 65
J.U. Holle, C. Dubrau, K. Herlyn, M. Heller, P. Ambrosch, B. Noelle, et al.
Rituximab for refractory granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's granulomatosis): comparison of efficacy in granulomatous versus vasculitic manifestations.
Ann Rheum Dis, 71 (2012), pp. 327-333
R.B. Jones.
Rituximab in the treatment of anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis.
Nephron Clin Pract, 128 (2014), pp. 243-249
K. Vos, R.M. Thurlings, C.A. Wijbrandts, D. van Schaardenburg, D.M. Gerlag, P.P. Tak.
Early effects of rituximab on the synovial cell infiltrate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Arthritis Rheum, 56 (2007), pp. 772-778
P. Roll, A. Palanichamy, C. Kneitz, T. Dorner, H.P. Tony.
Regeneration of B cell subsets after transient B cell depletion using anti-CD20 antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis.
Arthritis Rheum, 54 (2006), pp. 2377-2386
J.H. Anolik, D. Campbell, R.E. Felgar, F. Young, I. Sanz, J. Rosenblatt, et al.
The relationship of FcgammaRIIIa genotype to degree of B cell depletion by rituximab in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Arthritis Rheum, 48 (2003), pp. 455-459
D.O. Bunch, J.G. McGregor, N.B. Khandoobhai, L.T. Aybar, M.E. Burkart, Y. Hu, et al.
Decreased CD5(+) B cells in active ANCA vasculitis and relapse after rituximab.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 8 (2013), pp. 382-391
E.M. Vital, S. Dass, M.H. Buch, K. Henshaw, C.T. Pease, M.F. Martin, et al.
B cell biomarkers of rituximab responses in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Arthritis Rheum, 63 (2011), pp. 3038-3047
M.N. Lazarus, T. Turner-Stokes, K.M. Chavele, D.A. Isenberg, M.R. Ehrenstein.
B-cell numbers and phenotype at clinical relapse following rituximab therapy differ in SLE patients according to anti-dsDNA antibody levels.
Rheumatology (Oxford), 51 (2012), pp. 1208-1215
J.C. Edwards, L. Szczepanski, J. Szechinski, A. Filipowicz-Sosnowska, P. Emery, D.R. Close, et al.
Efficacy of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
N Engl J Med, 350 (2004), pp. 2572-2581
M. Martinez del Pero, A. Chaudhry, R.B. Jones, P. Sivasothy, P. Jani, D. Jayne.
B-cell depletion with rituximab for refractory head and neck Wegener's granulomatosis: a cohort study.
Clin Otolaryngol, 34 (2009), pp. 328-335
P. Roll, E. Ostermeier, M. Haubitz, S. Lovric, L. Unger, J. Holle, et al.
Efficacy and safety of rituximab treatment in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitides: results from a German registry (GRAID).
J Rheumatol, 39 (2012), pp. 2153-2156
R. Pullerits, M. Ljevak, J. Vikgren, M. Bokarewa.
Off-trial evaluation of the B cell-targeting treatment in the refractory cases of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis: long-term follow-up from a single centre.
Scand J Immunol, 76 (2012), pp. 411-420
Y. Pehlivan, B. Kisacik, V.K. Bosnak, A.M. Onat.
Rituximab seems to be a safer alternative in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with tuberculosis.
BMJ Case Rep, (2013), pp. 2013
R.B. Jones, J.W. Tervaert, T. Hauser, R. Luqmani, M.D. Morgan, C.A. Peh, et al.
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide in ANCA-associated renal vasculitis.
N Engl J Med, 363 (2010), pp. 211-220
D.M. Roberts, R.B. Jones, R.M. Smith, F. Alberici, D.S. Kumaratne, S. Burns, et al.
Rituximab-associated hypogammaglobulinemia: incidence, predictors and outcomes in patients with multi-system autoimmune disease.
J Autoimmun, 57 (2015), pp. 60-65
N. Venhoff, N.M. Effelsberg, U. Salzer, K. Warnatz, H.H. Peter, D. Lebrecht, et al.
Impact of rituximab on immunoglobulin concentrations and B cell numbers after cyclophosphamide treatment in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitides.
H. Marco, R.M. Smith, R.B. Jones, M.J. Guerry, F. Catapano, S. Burns, et al.
The effect of rituximab therapy on immunoglobulin levels in patients with multisystem autoimmune disease.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 15 (2014), pp. 178
M. Helena, R.B. Jones, R.M. Smith, F. Catapano, A.N. Chaundhry, D.R.W. Jayne.
Hypogammaglobulinaemia and infections following RTX therapy for systemic vasculitis and SLE.
Clin Exp Immunol, 164 (2011), pp. 59
C. Casulo, J. Maragulia, A.D. Zelenetz.
Incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia in patients receiving rituximab and the use of intravenous immunoglobulin for recurrent infections.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 13 (2013), pp. 106-111
A. Knight, H. Hallenberg, E. Baecklund.
Efficacy and safety of rituximab as maintenance therapy for relapsing granulomatosis with polyangiitis – a case series.
Clin Rheumatol, 33 (2014), pp. 841-848
D. Tesfa, J. Palmblad.
Late-onset neutropenia following rituximab therapy: incidence, clinical features and possible mechanisms.
Expert Rev Hematol, 4 (2011), pp. 619-625
B. Hugle, M. Solomon, E. Harvey, A. James, A. Wadhwa, R. Amin, et al.
Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia following rituximab treatment in Wegener's granulomatosis.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 62 (2010), pp. 1661-1664
G. Bussone, G. Kaswin, M. de Menthon, E. Delair, A.P. Brezin, L. Guillevin.
Macular oedema following rituximab infusion in two patients with Wegener's granulomatosis.
Clin Exp Rheumatol, 28 (2010), pp. 90-92
H.E. Harris.
Progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with rituximab.
Rheumatology (Oxford), 47 (2008), pp. 224-225
R.P. White, S. Abraham, S. Singhal, H. Manji, C.R. Clarke.
Progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy isolated to the posterior fossa in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Rheumatology (Oxford), 41 (2002), pp. 826-827
D. Gomez-Almaguer, L. Tarin-Arzaga, B. Moreno-Jaime, J.C. Jaime-Perez, A.A. Ceballos-Lopez, G.J. Ruiz-Arguelles, et al.
High response rate to low-dose rituximab plus high-dose dexamethasone as frontline therapy in adult patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia.
Eur J Haematol, 90 (2013), pp. 494-500
F. Zaja, N. Vianelli, S. Volpetti, M.L. Battista, M. Defina, S. Palmieri, et al.
Low-dose rituximab in adult patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia.
Eur J Haematol, 85 (2010), pp. 329-334
S.P. McAdoo, C.D. Pusey.
Should rituximab be used to prevent relapse in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 9 (2014), pp. 641-644

Please cite this article as: Alba MA, Flores-Suárez LF. Rituximab como terapia de mantenimiento en las vasculitis asociadas a ANCA: ¿cómo, cuándo y por qué? Reumatol Clin. 2016;12:39–46.

Copyright © 2015. Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Reumatología y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología
Reumatología Clínica (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.