Journal Information
Vol. 20. Issue 2.
Pages 80-83 (February 2024)
Visits
306
Vol. 20. Issue 2.
Pages 80-83 (February 2024)
Original Article
Full text access
The activity of psoriatic arthritis with axial involvement correlates with the PsAID12
La actividad de la artritis psoriásica con afectación axial se correlaciona con el PsAID12
Visits
306
Jose Antonio Pinto Tasendea, Carlota Laura Iñiguez Ubiagab, Victor Eliseo Quevedo Vilac, Luis Fernández Dominguezd, Francisco Jose Maceiras Pane, Carlos García Porrúab,
Corresponding author
carlos.garcia.porrua@sergas.es

Corresponding author.
a Servicio de Reumatología, INIBIC, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
b Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain
c Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital de Monforte, Monforte de Lemos, Lugo, Spain
d Servicio de Reumatología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
e Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Meixoeiro, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (2)
Table 1. Clinical-epidemiological characteristics of patients with psoriatic arthritis included in the study.
Table 2. Comparison of variables in patients, based on PsAID results.
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Objective

To determine the impact of the disease in patients with PsA in daily clinical practice and to evaluate its relationship with its axial activity.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in consecutive patients attended from January 2021 to December 2021 who met the CASPAR criteria, with clinical of inflammatory back pain and positive axial imaging, with or without peripheral involvement. Demographic, clinical, analytical data, HAQ index, PsAID12 and activity index (BASDAI and ASDAS-PCR) were also collected. Patients were divided into two groups, those with high impact and those with low impact according to PsAID results. Continuous variables are shown as median (Q1–Q3) and categorical variables as percentages and frequencies.

Results

Of the 269 patients evaluated with PsA, 72 patients with axial involvement were included, 40 men (55.6%), with a median age of 54.1 years and disease duration of 7 years. 28.3% of the patients were obese and serum CRP level was 0.45 mg/dl (0.08–1.10). BASDAI was 4.2 (2.0–6.2) and ASDAS-PCR was 2.4 (1.5–3.2), which translates into 39.6% of patients in low activity or remission. The median PsAID total score was 3.9 (1.6–5.4), evaluated in 61 patients. The patients who achieved a PsAID12 ≤ 4 were 63%, mostly men and with lower CRP levels than PsAID ≥ 4 patients. In addition, low impact measured by the PsAID12 was associated with low results in BASDAI and ASDAS-PCR.

Conclusions

Axial involvement reflected lower impact of the disease measured by PsAID12 and it is correlated with low activity measured by BASDAI and ASDAS-PCR.

Keywords:
Psoriatic arthritis
Axial involvement
PsAID
ASDAS
BASDA
Resumen
Objetivo

Determinar el impacto de la enfermedad en pacientes con artritis psoriásica (APs) en la práctica clínica diaria, y evaluar su relación con la actividad axial.

Métodos

Se realizó un estudio transversal multicéntrico en pacientes consecutivos vistos desde enero 2021 hasta diciembre 2021 que cumplieron con los criterios CASPAR, con clínica dolor lumbar inflamatorio y prueba de imagen positiva, con o sin afectación periférica. También se recogieron datos demográficos, clínicos, analíticos, índice Health Assessment Questionnaire, PsAID12 e índices de actividad axial (BASDAI y ASDAS-PCR). Se dividió a los pacientes en 2 grupos según el alto o bajo impacto del cuestionario PsAID. Las variables continuas se mostraron como mediana (Q1–Q3) y las categóricas como porcentajes y frecuencias.

Resultados

Se incluyeron 72 pacientes con afectación axial de los 269 evaluados con APs, 40 varones (55,6%), con una mediana de edad de 54,1 años y duración de la enfermedad de 7 años. El 28,3% de los pacientes eran obesos y el nivel sérico de PCR fue de 0,45 mg/dl (0,08–1,10). El BASDAI fue de 4,2 (2,0–6,2) y el ASDAS-PCR de 2,4 (1,5–3,2), estando en baja actividad o remisión el 39,6%. La mediana de la puntuación total de PsAID fue de 3,9 (1,6–5,4), evaluado en 61 pacientes. Los pacientes que alcanzaron un PsAID12 ≤ 4 fueron el 63%, predominantemente varones, presentaron valores de PCR menores y se asoció a una menor puntuación de BASDAI y ASDAS-PCR.

Conclusiones

Los pacientes con afectación axial reflejaban un bajo impacto de la enfermedad medido por PsAID12 y este se correlacionaba con baja actividad medido por BASDAI y el ASDAS-PCR.

Palabras clave:
Artritis psoriásica
Afectación axial
PsAID
ASDAS
BASDAI
Full Text
Introduction

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory disease within psoriatic diseases with diverse clinical manifestations which affect the quality of life of patients.1

Estimates of the worldwide prevalence of PsA range from 0.05% to 0.25% in the general population, and more than 30% of patients with cutaneous psoriasis have PsA. This percentage may be higher, as between 5% and 15.5% may go undiagnosed, as well as the fact that there may be a diagnostic delay of 6 months from the onset of symptoms.2,3

Its key domains are cutaneous and nail psoriasis, peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis and dactylitis, leading to bone damage, deformity and dysfunction.4

Axial involvement typically manifests as inflammatory low back pain (LBP). Accompanying these clinical symptoms are inflammatory structural changes that are manifested radiologically, both in the spine and the sacroiliac joints, with the combination of these two providing us with a diagnosis. Occasionally, this association may appear sub clinically or not be reported, so it is necessary to actively seek this in the patient interview.3,5

The high prevalence of the disease, as well as the clinical symptoms and delayed diagnosis reveal a major impact on the patient’s health. The PsA Impact of Disease (PsAID) questionnaire was developed to assess patients’ perspective on the disease in 12 domains, both physical and psychological, including pain, fatigue, work impairment or feelings of anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances or embarrassment,6 with scores associated with the importance of the effect of each on the patient. It is expected that the impact of the disease will improve (lower scores) when the patient is in remission or has low disease activity.

The main objective of this study was to determine the impact of the disease in a cohort of patients, measured through PsAID12, with axial involvement, and whether this impact was related to axial activity indices in clinical practice.

Methods

A multicentre, observational cross-sectional study was carried out in patients from a regional psoriatic arthritis register (SUEIRO register), seen consecutively in surgery visits from January 2021 to December 2021, who met CASPAR criteria for PsA,7 with clinical signs of non-specific low back pain and changes in imaging techniques at the axial level, both on plain radiography and positive magnetic resonance imaging (X-ray/MRI). All imaging tests run were assessed by the radiology department, and patients with possible confounding factors such as spondylarthrosis and Forestier’s disease were excluded. Patients could have peripheral involvement or otherwise and were treated according to clinical practice guidelines using the latest SER/EULAR recommendations.8,9

Demographic data were collected, including age, patient sex, body mass index (BMI; kg/m2), duration of disease measured in years, clinical symptoms, concomitant presence of fibromyalgia, laboratory parameters (CRP [mg/dl]), indices of disease activity both cutaneous by BSA and BASDAI, plus ASDAS-PCR for axial activity, the HAQ index (0–3) and PsAID12 (0–10).

Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with a PsAID above 4 (high impact) or below 4 (low impact).

Continuous variables were shown as median and interquartile range (IQR, Q1–Q3) and categorical variables as percentages and frequencies. Their normality adjustment was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov–Lilliefords test. To determine whether there was an association between variables, classic bivariate analysis tests were run. In the case of categorical variables, the Chi-square test was used, and if not figuring in its use cases, the Fisher’s exact test. For continuous variables, Student’s t-test was used when the assumptions of use were met and, in its absence, the Mann–Whitney U test. All analyses were run using SPSS®23 software. Differences were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 72 patients with axial involvement were included (Table 1A). Of these, 40 patients were male (55.6%) and 32 female (44.4%), with a median age of 54.1 years (IQR: 45.0–62.0) and a median duration of disease of 7 years (IQR: 2–11). Patients with normal weight accounted for 17.9% of the cases, 36.9% were overweight and 28.3% were obese. The mean serum CRP level was 0.45 mg/dl (IQR: 0.08–1.10). The treatments received by the patients were: NSAIDs (43.1%), glucocorticoids (21.6%), DMARDs (52.9%, the most frequent being methotrexate [46.4%], followed by leflunomide [7.1%] and sulfasalazine [4.8%]), and biological therapy (51.9%). A total of 10.7% of patients had a diagnosis of fibromyalgia in their medical history.

Table 1.

Clinical-epidemiological characteristics of patients with psoriatic arthritis included in the study.

A) Demographic and clinical variables of the patient population collected at the beginning of the study.
Variable  N = 72 
Sex
Male. n (%)  40 (55.6) 
Female. n (%)  32 (44.4) 
Age, years (IQR. Q1–Q3)  54.1 (45–62) 
Duration of illness, years (IQR. Q1–Q3)  7 (2–11) 
Body Mass Index (%)
Normal weight (18–24.9 kg/m217.9 
Overweight (25–29.9 kg/m236.9 
Obesity (>30 kg/m228.3 
Fibromyalgia (%)
Yes  10.7 
No  89.3 
Treatments (%)
NSAIDs  43.1 
Glucocorticoids  21.6 
DMARDs  52.9 
Methotrexate  46.4 
Leflunomide  7.1 
Sulfasalazine  4.8 
Biologicals  51.9 
Activity rates
BASDAI (IQR. Q1–Q3)  4.2 (2–6.2) 
ASDAS-PCR (IQR. Q1–Q3)  2.4 (1.5–3.2) 
BSA (IQR. Q1–Q3)  1.6 (0–4.8) 
HAQ (IQR. Q1–Q3)  0.5 (0–1) 
PsAID12 (IQR. Q1–Q3)  3.9 (1.6–5.4) 
B) Characteristics of the population with axial PsA that had performed PsAID12
Variable  N = 61 
Test the Schober (median (Q1–Q3)  4.5 (4.1–4.6) 
Sacroiliac involvement in plain radiology  24 (39.3%) 
Symmetrical  16 (66.6%) 
Asymmetricala  8 (33.3%) 
Involvement in NMRb  12 (19.6%) 
Vertebral  4 (33.3%) 
Sacroiliac  8 (66.6%) 

NSAIDs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; IQR, interquartile range; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.

a

Defined as a difference greater than 2 points in scores between each side.

b

All patients had bone oedema.

The median BASDAI calculated from the sample was 4.2 (IQR: 2.0–6.2) and the median ASDAS-CRP was 2.4 (IQR: 1.5–3.2), with 39.6% in low activity or remission. The median BSA was 1.6% (IQR: 0–4.8) and the median HAQ was 0.5 (IQR: 0–1). The PsAID questionnaire was evaluated in 61 patients, with a median total score of 3.9 (IQR: 1.6–5.4). The characteristics of metrology and axial involvement in this population that had done PsAID12 are shown in Table 1B. There was no significant correlation between PsAID12 and the Schober test (r: 0.186; p = −0.144) or the mSASSS radiographical damage index (r: 0.202; p = −0.143). Patients who achieved a PASS state and those who did not differed significantly in terms of the degree of sacroiliitis (p = 0.256), Schober’s test (p = 0.548) or mSASSS (p = 0.155).

Patients who achieved a PsAID12 ≤ 4 totalled 63% (Table 2); more were males (70% vs. 43.5%; p = 0.038) and with a lower CRP (0.30 vs. 1.04 mg/dl; p = 0.03). In addition, the low impact measured by PsAID12 was associated with lower BASDAI (2.1 vs. 6.1; p < 0.001) and ASDAS-PCR (1.5 vs. 3.1; p < 0.001) compared to those with PsAID > 4 values, with no statistically significant differences found, and with the extent of skin involvement measured by BSA (p = 0.594), disease duration (p = 0.432) or age of patients (p = 0.284).

Table 2.

Comparison of variables in patients, based on PsAID results.

Patient group  PsAID ≤ 4 (n = 39)  PsAID > 4 (n = 22)  p-Value 
Age, years  54 (42–62)  54 (49–66)  0.284 
Male, n (%)  28 (70)  10 (43.5)  0.038 
Years of diagnosisa  7 (3–10)  5 (1.2–9.5)  0.432 
CRP, mg/dl  0.30 (0.04–0.79)  1.04 (0.07–2.44)  0.03 
BSA. %a  0.2 (0–1)  0.5 (0–1.5)  0.594 
BASDAIa  2.1 (0.8–4.0)  6.1 (4.4–6.9)  <0.001 
ASDAS-PCRa  1.5 (1.1–2.4)  3.1 (2.3–3.4)  <0.001 

PsAID: Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease.

a

Interquartile range (Q1–Q3).

Finally, patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia had PsAID12 values above 4 compared to those without a diagnosis (p = 0.015).

Discussion

The axial involvement of psoriatic arthritis is sometimes asymptomatic and its diagnosis is reached in many cases by an active search motivated by high suspicion, unlike in ankylosing spondylitis, where low back pain is the first symptom for which the patient is referred to rheumatology consultations.10 In this regard, its diagnosis in routine clinical practice is not always easy.11

On the other hand, some studies have observed a relationship between axial involvement and earlier age of onset of the disease, greater presence of enthesitis, increased extent of skin involvement, depression, and the early need for biological treatment, when compared to exclusively peripheral joint involvement.12,13

Although these are 2 different conditions, in genetics and clinical and radiological findings,14 activity indices designed for ankylosing spondylitis are used in the assessment of axial involvement of psoriatic arthritis, making it difficult in clinical practice to use instruments that cover the broad spectrum of disease.15–17

The PsAID questionnaire was designed to assess quality of life and functionality from the perspective of patients with PsA,18 and has a solid basis and wide use as an assessment instrument in clinical trials.15 This data is evaluated mainly on peripheral involvement,19,20 with less information on the use of this index in axial involvement.

In our study, the data obtained from PsAID was correlated with data on disease activity, measured by both BASDAI and ASDAS and with the change in inflammatory parameters (measured by serum CRP levels), although no association with patient age or years of disease duration, etc. was confirmed, nor with the severity of skin involvement. These results are consistent with other published studies,21,22 where the results obtained from BASDAI and ASDAS were adjusted with the patient’s perception measured by PsAID and correlated with disease activity.

On the other hand, the presence of comorbidities can negatively affect the patient’s subjective perception of their disease, which may be reflected in the worsening of some indices, regardless of the activity of the psoriatic disease itself and the response to treatment. One of these comorbidities is fibromyalgia. In our study, although it was not included as the main objective, we found a greater impact of the disease in those patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia, compared to those who did not present this diagnosis. Lubrano et al. conducted a study on the impact of comorbidities, which supported their influence on disease control, therapeutic decisions, and strategies to be followed.23 Some comorbidities such as anxiety and fibromyalgia influence the measurement indices (DAPSA and PsAID) and these affect our decision-making in clinical practice.

Another potentially impactful factor is gender. In our sample, we found differences in PsAID values according to sex, so that a lower impact of the disease was confirmed in the male group, which is consistent with the results obtained in other studies.24

The results of this study support the use of the PsAID questionnaire not only in patients with PsA with peripheral or mixed involvement but they also confirm its usefulness in cases with axial involvement by demonstrating that there is a relationship between the findings obtained from axial activity indices (both BASDAI and ASDAS-PCR) and the patient’s perceived impact of their disease.

The limitations of this study derive from the cross-sectional and observational nature of its design, so it would be necessary to validate these findings in more studies with designs aimed at specifically exploring these results.

Conclusions

The results of this study show that there is a relationship between axial activity indices measured by BASDAI and ASDAS-PCR and the impact of the disease perceived by the patient, as measured by PsAID. The use of PsAID in PsA patients with axial involvement could provide relevant information from the point of view of the patient’s perception.

Ethical responsibilities

The source register, code 2015/671, was approved by committee and patients signed informed consent for inclusion.

Funding

None of the authors received financial support or any other benefits from commercial sources for the work reported in this manuscript.

Authorship

All authors contributed equally to this research.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest in the production of this article.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Galician Research Group on Psoriatic Arthritis and the Galician Society of Rheumatology for their advice in the design and review of the article. The authors are grateful for the assistance in medical writing provided by Medical Statistics Consulting S.L. (Valencia, Spain), within a PUBLIBECA programme.

References
[1]
C.T. Ritchlin, R.A. Colbert, D.D. Gladman.
Psoriatic arthritis.
N Engl J Med, 376 (2017), pp. 957-970
[2]
A. Urruticoechea-Arana, D. Benavent, F. León, R. Almodovar, I. Belinchón, P. de la Cueva, et al.
Psoriatic arthritis screening: a systematic literature review and experts’ recommendations.
PLoS One, 16 (2021), pp. e0248571
[3]
D. Poddubnyy, D.R. Jadon, F. van den Bosch, P.J. Mease, D.D. Gladman.
Axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis: an update for rheumatologists.
Semin Arthritis Rheum, 51 (2021), pp. 880-887
[4]
Y. Umezawa.
Psoriatic arthritis.
J Dermatol, 48 (2021), pp. 741-749
[5]
S.K. Felbo, L. Terslev, M. Østergaard.
Imaging in peripheral and axial psoriatic arthritis: contributions to diagnosis, follow-up, prognosis and knowledge of pathogenesis.
Clin Exp Rheumatol, 36 Suppl 114 (2018), pp. 24-34
[6]
L. Gossec, M. de Wit, U. Kiltz, J. Braun, U. Kalyoncu, R. Scrivo, et al.
A patient-derived and patient-reported outcome measure for assessing psoriatic arthritis: elaboration and preliminary validation of the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) questionnaire, a 13-country EULAR initiative.
Ann Rheum Dis, 73 (2014), pp. 1012-1019
[7]
W. Taylor, D. Gladman, P. Helliwell, A. Marchesoni, P. Mease, H. Mielants, et al.
Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study.
Arthritis Rheum, 54 (2006), pp. 2665-2673
[8]
L. Gossec, X. Baraliakos, A. Kerschbaumer, M. de Wit, I. McInnes, M. Dougados, et al.
EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update.
Ann Rheum Dis, 79 (2020), pp. 700-712
[9]
J.C. Torre Alonso, P. Díaz Del Campo Fontecha, R. Almodóvar, J.D. Cañete, C. Montilla Morales, M. Moreno, et al.
Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on treatment and use of systemic biological and non-biological therapies in psoriatic arthritis [Article in English, Spanish].
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed), 14 (2018), pp. 254-268
[10]
J. Feld, V. Chandran, N. Haroon, R. Inman, D. Gladma.
Axial disease in psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: a critical comparison.
Nat Rev Rheumatol, 14 (2018), pp. 363-371
[11]
X. Baraliakos, L.C. Coates, J. Braun.
The involvement of the spine in psoriatic arthritis.
Clin Exp Rheumatol, 33 (2015), pp. S31-S35
[12]
P.J. Mease, J.B. Palmer, M. Liu, A. Kavanaugh, R. Pandurengan, C.T. Ritchlin, et al.
Influence of axial involvement on clinical characteristics of psoriatic arthritis: analysis from the corrona psoriatic arthritis/spondyloarthritis registry.
J Rheumatol, 45 (2018), pp. 1389-1396
[13]
I. Sunar, S. Ataman, K. Nas, E. Kilic, B. Sargin, S.A. Kasman, et al.
Enthesitis and its relationship with disease activity, functional status, and quality of life in psoriatic arthritis: a multi-center study.
Rheumatol Int, 40 (2020), pp. 283-294
[14]
J. Feld, J.Y. Ye, V. Chandran, R.D. Inman, N. Haroon, R. Cook, et al.
Is axial psoriatic arthritis distinct from ankylosing spondylitis with and without concomitant psoriasis?.
Rheumatology (Oxford), 59 (2020), pp. 1340-1346
[15]
R. Almodóvar, J.D. Cañete, E. de Miguel, J.A. Pinto, R. Queiro.
Definition of remission and disease activity assessment in psoriatic arthritis: evidence and expert-based recommendations [Article in English, Spanish].
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed), 17 (2021), pp. 343-350
[16]
G. Kılıç, E. Kılıç, K. Nas, M. Karkucak, E. Çapkın, A.Z. Dağlı, et al.
Comparison of ASDAS and BASDAI as a measure of disease activity in axial psoriatic arthritis.
Clin Rheumatol, 34 (2015), pp. 515-521
[17]
J.S. Smolen, M. Schöls, J. Braun, M. Dougados, O. FitzGerald, D.D. Gladman, et al.
Treating axial spondyloarthritis and peripheral spondyloarthritis, especially psoriatic arthritis, to target: 2017 update of recommendations by an international task force.
Ann Rheum Dis, 77 (2018), pp. 3-17
[18]
L. Gossec, M. de Wit, U. Kiltz, J. Braun, U. Kalyoncu, R. Scrivo, et al.
A patient-derived and patient-reported outcome measure for assessing psoriatic arthritis: elaboration and preliminary validation of the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) questionnaire, a 13-country EULAR initiative.
Ann Rheum Dis, 73 (2014), pp. 1012-1019
[19]
K. Johnson, J.Y. Ye, V. Chandran, D.D. Gladman.
A novel role for the psoriatic arthritis impact of disease (PsAID) questionnaire.
Semin Arthritis Rheum, 49 (2019), pp. 241-245
[20]
R. Queiro, J.D. Cañete, C. Montilla, M. Abad, M. Montoro, S. Gómez, et al.
Minimal disease activity and impact of disease in psoriatic arthritis: a Spanish cross-sectional multicenter study.
Arthritis Res Ther, 19 (2017), pp. 72
[21]
R. Queiro, J.D. Cañete.
Good clinimetric alignment between remission and a low impact of disease in patients with axial psoriatic arthritis.
Clin Exp Rheumatol, 38 (2020), pp. 136-139
[22]
E.D.C. Ribeiro E Souza, S.C. da Silva Carneiro, M.A. Yazbek, R.S. Cássia Menin, C.B. Campanholo, J.N. Carneiro, et al.
Validation and clinical interpretability of PsAID — psoriatic arthritis impact disease.
Adv Rheumatol, 60 (2020), pp. 49
[23]
E. Lubrano, S. Scriffignano, A.B. Azuaga, J. Ramirez, J.D. Cañete, F.M. Perrotta.
Impact of Comorbidities on disease activity, patient global assessment, and function in psoriatic arthritis: a cross-sectional study.
Rheumatol Ther, 7 (2020), pp. 825-836
[24]
A.M. Orbai, J. Perin, C. Gorlier.
Determinants of patient-reported psoriatic arthritis impact of disease: an analysis of the association with gender in 458 patients from 14 countries.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), (2019),
Copyright © 2023. Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Reumatología y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología
Download PDF
Idiomas
Reumatología Clínica (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?