Compartir
array:23 [ "pii" => "S1699258X19301615" "issn" => "1699258X" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reuma.2019.10.003" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2021-06-01" "aid" => "1373" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Reumatología y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología" "copyrightAnyo" => "2019" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Reumatol Clin. 2021;17:343-50" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 27 "formatos" => array:2 [ "HTML" => 9 "PDF" => 18 ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:18 [ "pii" => "S1699258X19301330" "issn" => "1699258X" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reuma.2019.09.005" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2021-06-01" "aid" => "1371" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Reumatología y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Reumatol Clin. 2021;17:351-6" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 3 "formatos" => array:2 [ "HTML" => 1 "PDF" => 2 ] ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with lupus nephritis in Colombian patients: A cross-sectional study" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "351" "paginaFinal" => "356" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Factores clínicos y sociodemográficos asociados a nefritis lúpica en pacientes colombianos: resultados de un estudio transversal" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:6 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 847 "Ancho" => 1673 "Tamanyo" => 75469 ] ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Juan C. Díaz-Coronado, Adriana Rojas-Villarraga, Deicy Hernandez-Parra, Laura Betancur-Vásquez, Jorge Lacouture-Fierro, Daniel Gonzalez-Hurtado, Juanita González-Arango, Laura Uribe-Arango, Maria C. Gaviria-Aguilar, Ricardo A. Pineda-Tamayo" "autores" => array:10 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Juan C." "apellidos" => "Díaz-Coronado" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Adriana" "apellidos" => "Rojas-Villarraga" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Deicy" "apellidos" => "Hernandez-Parra" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Laura" "apellidos" => "Betancur-Vásquez" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jorge" "apellidos" => "Lacouture-Fierro" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Daniel" "apellidos" => "Gonzalez-Hurtado" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Juanita" "apellidos" => "González-Arango" ] 7 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Laura" "apellidos" => "Uribe-Arango" ] 8 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Maria C." "apellidos" => "Gaviria-Aguilar" ] 9 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Ricardo A." "apellidos" => "Pineda-Tamayo" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1699258X19301330?idApp=UINPBA00004M" "url" => "/1699258X/0000001700000006/v1_202105200700/S1699258X19301330/v1_202105200700/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S1699258X19301627" "issn" => "1699258X" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reuma.2019.10.004" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2021-06-01" "aid" => "1374" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Reumatología y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Reumatol Clin. 2021;17:335-42" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 3 "formatos" => array:2 [ "HTML" => 1 "PDF" => 2 ] ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Cost evolution of biological drugs in rheumatoid arthritis patients in a tertiary hospital: Influential factors on price" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "335" "paginaFinal" => "342" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Evolución del coste de medicamentos biológicos en pacientes con artritis reumatoide en un hospital terciario. Factores influyentes en dicha evolución" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 1292 "Ancho" => 2078 "Tamanyo" => 141925 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Proportion of active patients with optimized regimes.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Mariángeles González Fernández, Elena Villamañán, Inmaculada Jiménez-Nácher, Francisco Moreno, Chamaida Plasencia, Francisco Gayá, Alicia Herrero, Alejandro Balsa" "autores" => array:8 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Mariángeles" "apellidos" => "González Fernández" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Elena" "apellidos" => "Villamañán" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Inmaculada" "apellidos" => "Jiménez-Nácher" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Francisco" "apellidos" => "Moreno" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Chamaida" "apellidos" => "Plasencia" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Francisco" "apellidos" => "Gayá" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Alicia" "apellidos" => "Herrero" ] 7 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Alejandro" "apellidos" => "Balsa" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S2173574321001003" "doi" => "10.1016/j.reumae.2019.10.007" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2173574321001003?idApp=UINPBA00004M" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1699258X19301627?idApp=UINPBA00004M" "url" => "/1699258X/0000001700000006/v1_202105200700/S1699258X19301627/v1_202105200700/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:19 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Definition of Remission and Disease Activity Assessment in Psoriatic Arthritis: Evidence and Expert-Based Recommendations" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "343" "paginaFinal" => "350" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "Raquel Almodóvar, Juan D. Cañete, Eugenio de Miguel, José Antonio Pinto, Rubén Queiro" "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Raquel" "apellidos" => "Almodóvar" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Juan D." "apellidos" => "Cañete" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Eugenio" "apellidos" => "de Miguel" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "José Antonio" "apellidos" => "Pinto" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">d</span>" "identificador" => "aff0020" ] ] ] 4 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "Rubén" "apellidos" => "Queiro" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "rubenque7@yahoo.es" ] "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">e</span>" "identificador" => "aff0025" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:5 [ 0 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain" "etiqueta" => "a" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Clínic e IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain" "etiqueta" => "b" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 2 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain" "etiqueta" => "c" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] 3 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Department of Rheumatology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, Spain" "etiqueta" => "d" "identificador" => "aff0020" ] 4 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Spain" "etiqueta" => "e" "identificador" => "aff0025" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Definición de remisión y evaluación de la actividad de la enfermedad en la artritis psoriásica: recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia y la opinión de expertos" ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic heterogeneous inflammatory disease with a complex and varied clinical presentation. Its wide range of clinical manifestations and highly variable course make difficult the assessment of disease activity in routine clinical practice and in clinical trials.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a></p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In recent years, significant advances have been made in the management of PsA with the introduction of innovative drugs, new treatment strategies, such as the ‘treat to target’ (T2T), and the development of instruments and scales to assess the activity of the disease combining patient and physician perspectives together with results from objective tests.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> The primary goal of the treatment is the achievement of a state of clinical remission, including all the clinical features or domains of the disease, like musculoskeletal (arthritis, spondylitis, enthesitis, dactylitis) and skin involvement, as well as extra-articular manifestations. However, there is no universally accepted definition of remission for this entity.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,3,4</span></a></p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The objective of this article was to reach a consensus on the definition of remission in patients with PsA and give recommendations on the monitoring of the disease in clinical practice.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Material and methods</span><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In this project, a consensus method (modified Delphi) were used,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> which gathered the agreement of the experts based on their clinical experience and the available evidence. After an exhaustive review of the literature, a scientific committee composed of 5 renowned rheumatologists met to generate statements addressing the definition of remission of PsA in clinical practice. The questionnaire was submitted online in 2 rounds (September and October 2018) to a panel of Spanish rheumatologists with recognized experience in the management of PsA patients. The selection process of the expert panelists was based on: (1) more than 15 years of experience in the treatment of PsA; and (2) being part of multidisciplinary consultations with Dermatology. Additionally, preference was given to specialists who had participated in other studies on PsA. Their publishing activity on PsA was also taken into consideration. Most panelists were members of working groups focused on PsA (GEAPSOSER) or spondyloarthropathies (GRESSER) from the Spanish Society of Rheumatology.</p><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Panelists assessed the statements with a nine-point ordinal scale (1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>full disagreement, 9<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>full agreement). Responses were grouped into three categories: 1–3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>disagree; 4–6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>neither agree nor disagree; and 7–9<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>agree. Consensus on a statement was reached when the median of the responses was within the 7–9 category (consensus on agreement) or within the 1–3 category (consensus on disagreement) and less than one-third of the panelists voted outside these categories. In addition, the interquartile range (IQR) should have been less than 4. Items on which panelists did not reach consensus in the first round were re-evaluated during a second round using the same criteria.</p><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Results are shown in tables as median and IQR of the answers and degree of agreement, which was defined as the percentage of panelists who voted within the category that included the median of the answers. Taking into account the consensus statements, the scientific committee developed a table of conclusions and recommendations.</p></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Results</span><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The questionnaire consisted of 86 items divided into 3 blocks (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#tbl0005">Tables 1–3</a>) and was submitted to a panel of 130 rheumatologists. In the first round of evaluation 79 out of 130 panelists responded to the questionnaire. Consensus was reached on 60 out of the 86 statements evaluated in the first round. Twenty-six questions on which there was no consensus were subjected to a second round of evaluation with the participation of 77 panelists out of the 79 panelists that had taken part in the first round. After the second round, a consensus was reached on 2 of them. Subsequently, after 2 rounds of evaluation, a consensus was reached on 62 out of the 86 proposed items (72.0%). All of them reached consensus on agreement. <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0020">Table 4</a> summarizes the main statements agreed by the panelists and shows recommendations on the monitoring of the disease and a proposal for the definition of remission.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0010"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0015"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0020"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Discussion</span><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Currently, there is not a universally agreed definition of ‘remission’ in PsA.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,3,4</span></a> Equally, the best ways and instruments to monitor disease activity and adequate response to therapy remain uncertain.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0180"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> In this article, a significant number of rheumatologists with experience in the management of PsA reached a consensus on aspects related to the definition of remission and provided insights on how to monitor activity.</p><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Block I. State of the question and general concepts</span><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Firstly, the panel agreed on certain variables that should be included in the definition of remission such as: the absence of signs and symptoms, physical well-being, the absence of impact of the disease, the absence of inflammation in imaging tests and the absence of inflammation measured by biomarkers.</p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The panelists did not reach an agreement on the inclusion of the ‘absence of functional impairment’ in the concept of remission in PsA. Functional status is a crucial aspect of the disease, but we agree with other authors that inclusion of functional status in the definition of remission is not that straightforward, because functional status is not influenced by disease activity alone.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,4</span></a> Functional impairment may be due to previous sequelae (related or not to arthritis) despite the fact that the patient may be in remission, so it does not necessarily correlate with the current inflammatory activity of the disease but rather with the residual structural damage.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0185"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> In addition, functional status is influenced by other factors such as age or comorbid conditions. These arguments may explain why functional status, was not included into the definition of remission by the panel although it is critical for the patients.</p><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Similarly, the inclusion of ‘psychic well-being’ and ‘social well-being’ in the definition of ‘remission’ in PsA presents serious difficulties, because there are multiple external factors that may influence these aspects and not only the disease activity itself. The panel considered particularly important that the presence of concomitant fibromyalgia should be taken into account, since it has a remarkable effect on measures of impact of the disease.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0190"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a></p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The panelists agreed that the therapeutic goal of PsA should be to reach remission. However, this is not always possible, therefore, low or minimal disease activity is an acceptable goal. This statement is in line with recent guideline recommendations on the pharmacological management of PsA.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0180"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,9</span></a></p><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Some studies, including one randomized clinical trial<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0200"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> and real-world studies,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0205"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11,12</span></a> have emphasized the need to apply a treatment strategy based on objectives (T2T) in PsA, but our panel did not agree on this. The use of T2T approach may be limited due to lack of universal consensus on how to measure this objective (remission or low activity). The application of this strategy comes from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) data, where the objective is usually defined based on DAS28. However, PsA has a much more heterogeneous presentation and it is more difficult to define a single objective. Therefore, different objectives may be defined taking into account all domains of the disease, as the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) suggests.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0215"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a> Implementing this strategy may also require a more exhaustive follow-up, which is not always feasible in busy outpatient units.</p><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The panelists did not agree on the item that assessed to what extent the rheumatologists know the different instruments to measure disease activity. Rheumatologists are likely to have little knowledge about the instruments used in the assessment of patients with PsA. The infrequent use of these indices in clinical practice may be associated with the wide range of instruments available, their complexity, their limitations to cover the entire spectrum of the disease, and the lack of consensus in the literature regarding which tool should be applied routinely in real world setting. In our opinion, in clinical practice many rheumatologists may be using DAS28 because they are more familiar with the use of this instrument even though it was developed for the assessment of RA and not for PsA. However, the use of DAS28 has important limitations in PsA: it only adequately evaluates polyarticular forms (≥5 joints), the 28 painful/swollen joints count does not include some that are frequently affected in PsA patients, and other domains such as skin involvement or enthesitis are not assessed. In any case, it would be interesting to carry out studies to determine to what extent clinicians know and use the different measurement instruments and strategies such as the T2T in clinical practice, since there is significant scarcity of data in this regard.</p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Block II. General recommendations in the follow-up</span><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In this block of statements, the panel agreed on some practical recommendations on how to monitor disease activity. Firstly, it is recommended to use a composite index specifically designed for PsA to be used for the assessment of this condition. The panel considered that a minimum of variables should be included in the assessment of PsA in the outpatient setting, such as: joint pain, joint swelling, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin, nails, physical function, axial involvement, quality of life, structural damage by means of imaging techniques, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, patient global assessment, assessment of the skin by the patient, physician global assessment of musculoskeletal manifestations, physician global assessment of the skin, and extra-articular manifestations. However, it has been pointed out that the application of these instruments can be time-consuming and it is not always realistic to evaluate all of these variables in routine clinical practice.</p><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Fatigue was not included among the variables that might be routinely assessed. Although fatigue is prevalent in PsA patients, it may be the result of comorbidities or prior functional impairment not necessarily related to current disease activity.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0220"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a> Emotional well-being assessment can also create confusion due to similar reasons. Therefore, fatigue and emotional well-being might be included in the anamnesis, however they do not necessarily measure disease activity systematically. On the contrary, it is important to bear in mind that these variables may interfere with the assessment of disease activity.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15</span></a></p><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The inclusion of imaging tests for the assessment of PsA provides an objective parameter, which could allow for the evaluation of both inflammatory activity and structural damage as well. However, there is currently no consensus on what tests should be done and how often. It has been established that radiography has a prognostic value in PsA, as joint damage detected by radiographs is an independent variable in the prognosis of further radiological progression.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0230"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> In the clinical trial ADEPT, radiographs of hands and feet were used successfully to assess the inhibition of structural damage by adalimumab compared to placebo in PsA patients at 48 weeks and 2 years.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0235"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> Furthermore, although ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are more sensitive to detect erosions than radiography<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0230"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> and both are the most sensitive methods for soft tissue assessment,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0230"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> their role in the follow-up of inflammatory activity has not been clearly established as yet.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18</span></a> These tests may be necessary in some patients when there are doubts about the type of inflammatory involvement (synovitis, enthesitis and/or dactylitis), in locations where physical examination has limitations (spine, sacroiliac joints), or when there is disagreement between the subjective assessment of the patient and the objective data obtained by physical examination, laboratory tests or disease activity indices. The detection of subclinical inflammation on medical imaging complicates the definition of remission because the meaning and implications of this activity are not completely understood. Some studies suggest that it is related to the development of flares and structural damage.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0245"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19,20</span></a> Persistent synovitis and enthesitis detected by US after 6 months of therapy might be predictors of subsequent structural progression. In addition, amongst patients with PsA in clinical remission, power Doppler ultrasound-detected synovitis is a strong predictor of short-term flare of the disease.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0255"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">21</span></a></p><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Regarding acute phase response indices, such as CRP, it is important to emphasize that these laboratory markers of inflammation have limitations since both are elevated in only half of the patients with PsA. However, when these two markers keep increasing, their utility for the evaluation of disease activity is undeniable.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0260"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22</span></a></p><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">No consensus was reached on what should be the optimal frequency of follow-up visits in patients who have achieved the objective of having the inflammatory activity of their disease controlled. A follow up at 4 months intervals has been suggested, but this may vary depending on several factors. We propose that in patients in clinical remission without treatment, the visits could be spaced even up to every 6–9 months. However, it is important to allow the patient the possibility to return in case of a flare. A plan that could be used is to progressively prolong the intervals between the visits once the patient has reached remission (6, 9, 12 months), especially if nursing consultations are used as suitable alternatives.</p></span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0095">Block III. Specific recommendations on the use of activity indices</span><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The panelists agreed that the most recommended tool to assess the disease activity in the clinic is the Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), with cut-off values of ≤4 for remission and >4–14 for low disease activity. Similarly, the most recommended index to assess whether the patient has reached minimum disease activity is the MDA,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0265"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">23</span></a> when at least 5 out of 7 criteria are met. The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0270"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">24</span></a> may be used in cases with axial involvement, with the following cut-off values: <1.3 for remission and <2.1 for low disease activity. We propose that the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (cut-off values: ≤2 for remission and ≤4 for LDA) may be used as an alternative to ASDAS. So the proposed definition of remission in PsA included: the absence of disease activity assessed by using DAPSA or MDA, and in patients with axial involvement, the absence of activity evaluated by ASDAS (or BASDAI as an alternative). There was also consensus to include the PsA Impact of Disease questionnaire (PsAID) and Patient Global Assessment questionnaire (PtGA) in the assessment of the impact of the disease during the follow-up visits.</p><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">DAPSA is an index that includes patient global and pain assessments, 68 tender joint count (68 TJC) and 66 swollen joint count (66 SJC) assessments, and CRP levels. One important advantage of DAPSA over other indices is that it provides a continuous measure and thresholds for high, moderate or low activity and remission based on a score.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0275"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">25</span></a> Higher DAPSA scores are significantly associated with higher probability of structural progression.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0265"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">23</span></a> Furthermore, DAPSA correlated with function<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0265"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">23</span></a> and with the impact of disease as measured by PsAID.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0280"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">26</span></a> In addition, it has been validated in clinical trials.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0275"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">25</span></a> Limitations of DAPSA are that it does not contain domains for skin, enthesitis, dactylitis, or axial disease assessments.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0275"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">25</span></a></p><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">On the other hand, MDA is a dichotomous instrument (Yes/No answers) that includes seven variables (tender/swollen joint counts, tender entheseal points, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index or body surface area, patient pain and global activity visual analog scale, and functional evaluation by Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]). It has been widely used in clinical practice, including clinical trials using T2T approach, and in real life observational studies.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0285"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27</span></a> A sustained achievement of MDA is associated with improved prognosis in terms of joint damage progression confirmed both by observational studies and registries, and likely with improvements in function and quality of life.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0285"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27</span></a> MDA has certain limitations as well. It has been argued that the lack of acute-phase reactants could limit the validity of MDA. Additionally, MDA includes a low level of HAQ, which may be difficult to be achieved in an established disease irrespective of disease activity levels.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0285"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27</span></a> Finally, it has been recently showed that DAPSA-based remission/low disease activity performs better than MDA to detect patient-defined remission or remission/low disease activity.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a></p><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In axial SpA, evidence suggests that the ASDAS better reflects the inflammatory disease processes (both with biomarkers of inflammation and MRI inflammation scores) than BASDAI.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0295"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a> In line with recent recommendations,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> we considered that ASDAS is preferred, and BASDAI may be used as an alternative.</p><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The assessment of quality of life is an important outcome measure from the perspective of the patient and includes aspects not evaluated in the usual activity indices. In this consensus, the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID)<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0300"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a> was the tool that obtained greater degree of agreement. The initial validation study by <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Gossec et al.</span><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0300"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a> demonstrated that PsAID has good correlation with patient global assessment, little variability in a retest when the patient was asked again 2–10 days later, and an acceptable sensitivity for treatment changes.</p><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There are several limitations of our consensus that must be noted. The Delphi methodology prevents discussing the statements in detail and the questionnaire is designed by a limited number of experts so some issues may be overlooked. For instance, we do not include in the questionnaire statements related to other indices designed to evaluate disease activity. However, based on the evidence and our expertise we considered that the included indices were the most realistic in clinical practice. It might also be argued that the panelists agreed that the aim of treatment should be the clinical remission of musculoskeletal, skin and nail inflammatory manifestations, and that multiple domains should be evaluated, but they only selected tools to define remission that include a limited number of domains, such as DAPSA that only assesses the joints. Moreover, imaging is not directly included in these instruments. However, panelists’ statements in block I and II are related to an ideal definition of remission while DAPSA or MDA could have been selected taking into account a more practical definition of remission in real life, with limitations but realistic and practical, having also in mind that achieving these goals is associated with less radiographic progression.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0285"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27</span></a></p></span></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0100">Conclusion</span><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Based on the opinion of a significant number of rheumatologists with experience in the management of PsA, we propose a definition of remission in PsA as the absence of disease activity evaluated by DAPSA or MDA (ASDAS and/or BASDAI in patients with axial involvement), which would imply absence of signs or symptoms of inflammation, physical well-being, lack of disease impact, and absence of inflammation as measured by biological markers. The recommended indexes for monitoring disease activity are DAPSA and MDA. ASDAS is preferred in cases with axial involvement, with BASDAI as an alternative. PsAID is the preferred tool to assess disease impact.</p></span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0105">Funding support</span><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Novartis Pharmaceuticals funded this work without participating in its design, analysis of data, or preparation of the manuscript. Panelists received no funding for their contribution.</p></span><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0110">Conflict of interest</span><p id="par0140" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Raquel Almodóvar has received payments for lectures, advisory services, attendance at conferences, training courses and development of educational programs from Abbvie, Celgene, Gebro, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB.</p><p id="par0145" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Juan D. Cañete has received payments by conference or scientific consultancies from Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB.</p><p id="par0150" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Eugenio de Miguel has received payments for lectures or educational material, research funds and advisory services from Abbvie, Novartis, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Jansen, Grunental, UCB and BMS.</p><p id="par0155" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">José A. Pinto has received payments by conference or scientific consultancies from BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and MSD.</p><p id="par0160" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Rubén Queiro has received payments as panelist, lecturer, member of advisory councils and as researcher from Abbvie, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, UCB and Celgene. He has also received research funds from Abbvie and Novartis.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:13 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres1513244" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Objective" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Methods" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusion" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1372441" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres1513245" "titulo" => "Resumen" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Objetivo" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Metodología" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Conclusión" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1372440" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Material and methods" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Discussion" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Block I. State of the question and general concepts" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Block II. General recommendations in the follow-up" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Block III. Specific recommendations on the use of activity indices" ] ] ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "Conclusion" ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0045" "titulo" => "Funding support" ] 10 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0050" "titulo" => "Conflict of interest" ] 11 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xack531225" "titulo" => "Acknowledgements" ] 12 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2019-06-21" "fechaAceptado" => "2019-10-10" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1372441" "palabras" => array:7 [ 0 => "Arthritis" 1 => "Psoriatic" 2 => "Remission" 3 => "Inflammation" 4 => "Drug monitoring" 5 => "Delphi technique" 6 => "Outcome and process assessment (health care)" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1372440" "palabras" => array:6 [ 0 => "Artritis psoriásica" 1 => "Remisión" 2 => "Inflamación" 3 => "Monitoreo de drogas" 4 => "Técnica Delphi" 5 => "Evaluación de procesos y resultados (atención de salud)." ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Objective</span><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">We aimed to reach a consensus on the best instruments to monitor disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to develop a consensus definition of remission.</p></span> <span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0015">Methods</span><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A modified Delphi approach was used. A scientific committee provided statements addressing the definition of remission and the monitoring of PsA in clinical practice. The questionnaire was evaluated in 2 rounds by rheumatologists with experience in managing PsA patients.</p></span> <span id="abst0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0020">Results</span><p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A panel of 77 rheumatologists reached agreement on 62 out of the 86 proposed items (72.0%). The most recommended index for monitoring disease activity was DAPSA (cut-off values: ≤4 for remission and >4–14 for low disease activity ([LDA]), MDA (at least 5/7 criteria). In cases with axial involvement, ASDAS was the preferred index (cut-off values: <1.3 for remission and <2.1 for LDA). BASDAI (cut-off values: ≤2 for remission and ≤4 for LDA) may be used as an alternative. PsAID was the preferred tool to assess disease impact.</p></span> <span id="abst0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Conclusion</span><p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">We propose a definition of remission in PsA as the absence of disease activity evaluated by DAPSA or MDA (ASDAS and/or BASDAI in patients with axial involvement), which would imply absence of signs or symptoms of inflammation, physical well-being, lack of disease impact, and absence of inflammation as measured by biological markers.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Objective" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Methods" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusion" ] ] ] "es" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Objetivo</span><p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Nuestro objetivo era alcanzar un consenso sobre los mejores instrumentos para monitorizar la actividad de la enfermedad en pacientes con artritis psoriásica (AP) y desarrollar una definición consensuada de remisión.</p></span> <span id="abst0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Metodología</span><p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Se utilizó una metodología Delphi modificada. Un comité científico propuso aseveraciones relacionadas con la definición de remisión y la monitorización de la AP en la clínica. El cuestionario fue evaluado en 2 rondas por reumatólogos con experiencia en el manejo de la AP.</p></span> <span id="abst0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Resultados</span><p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Un panel de 77 reumatólogos alcanzó un acuerdo en 62 de los 86 ítems propuestos (72,0%). El índice más recomendado para monitorizar la actividad de la enfermedad fue DAPSA (valores de corte: ≤<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>4 para la remisión y ><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>4-14 para baja actividad de la enfermedad ([LDA]), MDA (al menos 5/7 criterios). En los casos con afectación axial, el índice preferido fue ASDAS (valores de corte: <<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1,3 para remisión y <<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2,1 para LDA). Como alternativa puede usarse BASDAI (valores de corte: ≤<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2 para remisión y ≤<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>4 para LDA). PsAID fue la herramienta preferida para evaluar el impacto de la enfermedad.</p></span> <span id="abst0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Conclusión</span><p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Proponemos una definición de remisión en pacientes con AP como la ausencia de actividad de la enfermedad evaluada mediante DAPSA o MDA (ASDAS y/o BASDAI en pacientes con afectación axial), lo que implicaría ausencia de signos o síntomas de inflamación, bienestar físico, ausencia de impacto de la enfermedad y ausencia de inflamación medida por marcadores biológicos.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Objetivo" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Metodología" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Conclusión" ] ] ] ] "multimedia" => array:4 [ 0 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at1" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Median (IQR) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Degree of agreement \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Result \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1. In the management of psoriatic arthritis, there is no consensus definition of “remission”. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 (7–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">87.3% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="4" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="4" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">The definition of “remission” in PsA should include:</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2. Absence of symptoms and signs of inflammation. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (9–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">100.0%. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>3. Absence of functional impairment. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">4 (2–7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">22.1% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No consensus \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>4. Physical well-being. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7 (7–8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">77.2% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>5. Psychic well-being. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">6 (3–7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">18.2% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No consensus \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>6. Social welfare. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">5 (2–7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">19.5% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No consensus \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>7. Absence of impact of disease (e.g., PsAID<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1.4). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7 (7–8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">83.5% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>8. Absence of progression in imaging tests. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 (8–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">86.1% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>9. Absence of inflammation in imaging tests. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 (7–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">84.8% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>10. Absence of inflammation measured by biological markers. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 (8–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">96.2% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>11. Withdrawal of treatment. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3 (2–5) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">62.3% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No consensus \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>12. The therapeutic goal of psoriatic arthritis should be to achieve remission, or if this is not possible, minimal disease activity \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (9–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">100.0% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>13. In usual clinical practice, some activity evaluation index is systematically used \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7 (5–8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">55.8% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No consensus \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>14. There is no consensus recommendation on which activity evaluation index should be used to monitor the therapeutic response in psoriatic arthritis \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 (7–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">92.4% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>15. In usual clinical practice, the strategy of treatment by objectives (treat to target) is not usually used for the treatment of people with psoriatic arthritis. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7 (4–8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">51.9% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No consensus \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>16. There is a need to define a minimum of variables that should be measured during consultation when treating a patient with psoriatic arthritis taking into account the time constraints. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (8–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">94.9% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>17. It is necessary to take into account the opinion of the patient when determining disease remission \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 (7–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">94,9% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>18. The disease impact on the patient should be quantified through validated questionnaires \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (8–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">96.2% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>19. The psychosocial aspect of remission must be taken into account, because it may alter the definition of remission. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 (6–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">72.2% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>20. To determine disease remission, it is necessary to take into account coexisting factors (fibromyalgia, etc.) that can alter the activity indices of the disease. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (8–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">94.9% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>21. During the evaluation of psoriatic arthritis patients, the presence of comorbidities must be added to the value obtained by the composite indices. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7 (5–8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">67.1% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>22. In usual practice, rheumatologists do not have a high level of knowledge of the tools available to measure the activity of the disease. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7 (4.5–7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">51.9% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No consensus \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>23. In usual practice, rheumatologists do not adequately use the tools available to measure the quality of life. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7 (6–8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">68.4% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab2598316.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Results block I. State of the question and general concepts.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0010" "etiqueta" => "Table 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at2" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Median (IQR) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Degree of agreement \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Result \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>24. It is advisable to use a composite index to monitor the activity of the disease in people with psoriatic arthritis. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (8–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">89.9% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>25. In case of measuring disease activity, it is advisable to use indices designed specifically for psoriatic arthritis. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (8–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">97.5% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="4" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " colspan="4" align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">The clinical assessment of a patient with psoriatic arthritis in the consultation should include minimum the evaluation of:</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>26. Joint pain. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (9–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">100.0% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>27. Enthesitis. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (9–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">98.7% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>28. Dactylitis. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (9–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">98.7% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>29. Skin. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (7–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">91.1% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>30. Nails. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 (7–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">86.1% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>31. Physical function. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 (7–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">87.3% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>32. Fatigue. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">6 (5–8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">29.9% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No consensus \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>33. Axial involvement. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (9–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">97.5% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>34. Quality of life. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 (7–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">82.3% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>35. Emotional well-being. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">6 (4.5–7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">29.9% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No consensus \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>36. Structural damage by means of imaging techniques. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 (7–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">87.3% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>37. PCR. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (8–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">96.2% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>38. Cost-benefit of drugs. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7 (3–8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">51.9% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No consensus \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>39. Overall assessment of the patient. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (8–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">97.5% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>40. Skin assessment by the patient. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7 (6–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">73.4% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>41. Overall assessment of musculoskeletal manifestations by the physician \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (8–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">93.7% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>42. Overall skin assessment by the physician \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 (7–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">81.0% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>43. Extra-articular manifestations. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (8–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">92.4% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>44. The use of treatment by objectives strategy (treat to target) in the management of patients with severe psoriatic arthritis with high risk of poor outcome is adequate. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (8–9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">96.2% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Agreement in 1st round \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n